this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
16 points (100.0% liked)

New York Times gift articles

1110 readers
3 users here now

Share your New York Times gift articles links here.

Rules:

Info:

Tip:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/3853502

To be clear: carbon capture like this is a tiny and expensive part of what needs doing over the next few years

It's getting a lot of support and publicity in large part because it's backed by the oil industry, which is trying to create social permission for continued extraction and burning on a much larger scale than the removal.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They're kind of quiet about that, though it's probably about 30% to 50% of what they're removing.

[–] MightEnlightenYou@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Did you mean to say 30-50x of what they're removing?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

No. It's nowhere near that bad; just a lot cheaper and easier to not burn fossil fuels in the first place in almost all cases.