this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
326 points (86.4% liked)

Leftism

2439 readers
2 users here now

Our goal is to be the one stop shop for leftism here at lemmy.world! We welcome anyone with beliefs ranging from SocDemocracy to Anarchism to post, discuss, and interact with our community. We are a democratic community, and as such, welcome metaposts that seek to amend the rules through consensus. Post articles, videos, questions, analysis and more. As long as it's leftist, it's welcome here!

Rules:

Posting Expectations:

Sister Communities:

!abolition@slrpnk.net !antiwork@lemmy.world !antitrumpalliance@lemmy.world !breadtube@lemmy.world !climate@slrpnk.net !fuckcars@lemmy.world !iwwunion@lemmy.ml !leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com !leftymusic@lemmy.world !privacy@lemmy.world !socialistra@midwest.social !solarpunk@slrpnk.net Solarpunk memes !therightcantmeme@midwest.social !thepoliceproblem@lemmy.world !vuvuzelaiphone@lemmy.world !workingclasscalendar@lemmy.world !workreform@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheLurker@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No no, They are against imperialism. Your example isn't valid because that's not imperialism, that's just spreading the socialist revolution, which requires military "support" because it is the only way to remove the imperialist and decolonise a nation.

No no, stationing the socialist revolutionary guard in said country isn't imperialism because it's under the flag of socialism, don't you see the difference?

Brought to you by the cognitive dissonance of Marxist.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 years ago

True, it's not their fault that they inherited an empire. Liberating Siberia would be nonsensical after the revolution which was a liberation. An independent Siberia (or several independent Siberian states) would be less free since all states are evil so why not keep the worst one.