this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
183 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ThomasMuentzner@hexbear.net 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Hey this is not a conflict at all , "Personal responibility" is complettly compatible with communism ,.. have you ever heard of "the Wall " ? soviet-playful

[–] WithoutFurtherBelay@hexbear.net 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

actually the only reason that was justifiable was because the ruling class will only give up power by force

[–] ThomasMuentzner@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

na

"obligation" - check out this word , its not big in Angloida Culture , but its important. there are certain "obligations" you have to fullfill .. and when you dont ... you lose "coverage" only the fullfillment of "obligation" comits the other party to fullfill its "obligation" as well. A Contract commits both Parties .. Dont break it.

[–] usernamesaredifficul@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I disagree some obligations you are still bound by whatever the other party does. To give a microcosm argument if your wife cheats on you it's still wrong to beat her up.

Killing the romanovs was for the russians a sad necessity as otherwise they would have been weaponised and it was still a great wrong Nicholas and his wife less so but the kids that was actually wrong. It would have been far better to go the Puyi route or raise the children anonymously or something

[–] ThomasMuentzner@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"§ 241 Para. 1 BGB describes the performance obligations:

By virtue of the obligation, the creditor is entitled to demand performance from the debtor. The performance can also consist of an omission. "

in this case the Injured Party choose "omission" and you may have noticed , it worked very well , the Tsars have not violated any Obligation ever since.
soviet-playful

[–] usernamesaredifficul@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

that's the most German argument I've ever seen first off so congrats

German law is not morality. Your obligations are much deeper in truth than that law says

[–] ThomasMuentzner@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago

Your obligations are much deeper in truth than that law says

Exactly ! 👇

[–] SoyViking@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago

No! Not that kind of personal responsibility!