this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2023
-30 points (27.9% liked)

politics

24886 readers
2689 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I agree. What exactly is Biden doing wrong with Israel?

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Subsidizing their genocide, for one. But that, unfortunately, is a widely popular position both amongst US politicians and the general population, and is unlikely to change in the near-future regardless of who is in office.

[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Can you explain how he is subsidizing the Israeli’s genocide? I don’t quite understand.

[–] blazera@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Do you...really not know about the billions we've been giving to Israel for decades?

[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes I’m well aware of that. I’m asking whose genocide we are subsidizing. It’s clearly not the Israeli’s since we are giving money to them.

[–] wagesj45@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We're giving Israel the money and weapons to perpetrate a genocide on Palestinians.

[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Ok so a couple of things.

First, when we speak of genocide, generally it is with reference to the victim of the genocide. Using the Holocaust as an example, do you refer to this as the Nazi genocide or the Jewish genocide?

Second, we are not funding a genocide against the Palestinians. Israel is fighting Hamas, not the Palestinians. The Palestinians are unfortunate pawns being used by Hamas to shield themselves from Israel. This is an over simplification of the situation, but I don’t think it is fair to say we are funding a genocide against the Palestinians via the Israelis.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The thing is, Israel didn't appear to be trying at all to spare civilians. Maybe there is lip service offered but nothing else. IDF is killing any motherfuckers they feel like and horrific acts are being perpetuated without any repercussions - allegedly murdering every woman and child they could in a school. Murdering their own people. Maybe out of indifference or maybe out of hate, it makes no difference to the dead.

Hamas started this latest round but Israel has been treating Palestinians like garbage for decades. It was inevitable they would act. I don't see Hamas as appreciably worse than the Israeli government. I have empathy for both Jews and Palestinians. The governments aren't the same as the people, and the governments are both evil.

The difference is Israel is the group with all the power and military might, so they have the obligation to use that power responsibly. They aren't. They are guaranteeing hatred persists for another couple of generations.

I'm sure Biden is working behind the scenes, but the public face he presents isn't how I want my country to be seen. I'm voting for him because Trump is worse yet, but Biden has been disappointing on this crisis.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Indifference to civilians is not genocide. It's basically the history of war up to the end of the 20th century. When the US and UK bombed German factories in WW2, they didn't care how many civilians were in or near those factories. Roughly 500,000 German civilians were killed by strategic bombing over two years.

The concept of "using power responsibly" and the obligation to minimize civilian deaths are brand new ideas that made their debut in America's War on Terror as part of their "hearts and minds" strategy. You shouldn't assume that everyone else in the world will follow that strategy.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I mean I have the expectation they'll follow it if they want support. I don't much care of you can justify it as a traditional stance on humanitarianism, it's bullshit. Always was.

And I won't argue your definition of genocide because it's not actually essential to my point, but I do think it's supported if you examine the totality of the treatment of Palestinians by Israel.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Minimizing civilian casualties was not humanitarian, it was a necessary part of America's ultimate goal: nation-building.

I don't think that's America's goal here.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Maybe this is just an age difference here - I'm fifty - but bringing up Iraq and Afghanistan like you think that's where I get my moral stance on war from is completely lost on me. I was in and out of the army before either. My perspective is post-Vietnam.

And look, I don't think everything the allies did in WW2 was awesome either, but that was a case of total war. A kind of war that actually didn't really exist before the twentieth century, rather than all of history as you seen to suggest. The goal was absolute capitulation ASAP including by cruel indifference and mass murder - civilians were seen as part of the war machine by providing labor, food, and an economy to support the German war machine. I won't defend it, but I will observe that Palestinians are already under Israeli authority. They are already defeated. They are already essentially living in a prison camp. This isn't total war, this is asymmetric warfare between a subjugated people and a greater technological, military, and economic power. Not comparable.