this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
174 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Death note? reasonable. everything else? major red flags, somebody like that should get no love.

[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's Killers of the Flower Moon bad? I haven't read it

[–] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's fine but it's the kinda book that this guy would only have bought because he worships Scorsese as the pinnacle of Kino, and has not actually read it. It's so unrelated to and unlike the rest of his stuff that no other outcome is likely. Check out that perfect spine.

Actually, check out the perfect spines on everything but the two Death note re-releases.

[–] abc@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be fair like 3/4ths of the books on this 'shelf' are hardcovers and aren't exactly going to show any wear in the spines if read. Hell, how hard do you have to treat a average sized paperback like the Killers of the Flower Moon copy to have it show any sort of wear on the spine in a tight bookshelf like that

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

how hard do you have to treat a average sized paperback like the Killers of the Flower Moon copy to have it show any sort of wear on the spine in a tight bookshelf like that

To be fair I like to beat the heck out of my books so they know who's boss

[–] abc@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago

what your books see when you approach your bookshelf kiryu-approaching

[–] HexBroke@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

The only time anyone has seen more crack than my bookshelves is the CIA in the 80s

[–] star_wraith@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

I’m the opposite, I gingerly open my books and freak out if I damage it at all when I’m reading it.

[–] RonPaulyShore@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Martin Scorsese isn't the pinnacle of kino

Oof.

And frankly, Marty's adaption is radical and good insofar as it centers the narrative away from the mystery and white saviors (and interrogates the readers/viewers consumption of such narratives); much more likely he got it at a Hudson News for a flight on recommendation from his step father, liked reading about the FBI, and was disappointed with the movie, as it made him very uncomfortable.

[–] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Haven't seen the film yet and had been planning to sleep on it but I'll give it a look.

I don't necessarily think Scorsese is bad, just that he's incredibly overrated and largely put up on an unachievable pedestal that nobody can truly live up to.

[–] RonPaulyShore@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

He's not. Afterhours, King of Comedy, Age of Innocence, Cape Fear, Silence -- this dudes B-sides make your favorite auteur envious.

[–] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

You're entitled to your own opinion. He's made some good films, I'm just not really big on the whole auteur hero-worship thing.

[–] oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No, it's actually not that bad. The movie based on it is good to. I guess the Ron Paul and leadership books took too much of my attention.

[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it's definitely a "one of these things is not like the others" shelf

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

Imagine still being a ron paul guy in 24**___**