this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
41 points (97.7% liked)

urbanism

22449 readers
1 users here now

This was supposed to be c/traingang, so post as many train pictures as possible.

All about urbanism and transportation, including freight transportation.

Home of train gang

:arm-L::train-shining::arm-R:

Trainposts highly encouraged

Talk about supply chain issues here!

List of cool books and videos about urbanism, transit, and other cool things

Titles must be informative. Please do not title your post "lmao" or use the tired "_____ challenge" format.

Archive links for reactionary sites, including the BBC.

LANDLORDS COWER IN FEAR OF MAOTRAIN

"that train pic is too powerful lmao" - u/Cadende

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the last 40 years can you remember an adult lead character choosing to ride a bike as a form of transportation in an American movie or tv series?

If a minor character has a bike and uses it for transportation - it's clear they would like a car but for whatever reason they don't have one. Another character might say to them "Why don't you have a car?" and their reply will be something like "Don't ask."

Last night I watched "Flashdance (1983)". Jennifer Beals plays an 18 year-old who lives on her own and she doesn't have a car. She uses a bike instead.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spectre@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That site is so maddening.

The Watsonian explanations can vary.

I know that It's A Waste of Time but Part of Me is still curious about what "Watsonian" means. Yet I Know it's going to be a Great Annoyance and Death by Hyperlink due the site being a Self-Referential Jargon Machine. Furthermore...

[–] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I checked and it's just their jargon for "diegetic," for when someone wants to say "in-universe" but in an obtuse and weird referential way instead of just using an esoteric word.

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I really wonder if some people at that site, reddit, and similar sites use words like "diegetic" and "in medias res" in spoken speech to sound sophisticated.

---

It's a shame TV Tropes probably has 100s of times as much text as it should. Maybe one day somebody will scrape the entire site and stick the text into AI. They'll give AI a prompt like "Remove the wheat from the chaff and convert to everyday English". If that ever happens - man, will the TV Tropes editors be mad!

But Less Is More and Too Clever Is Dumb and Those Are the Breaks.

[–] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean I use random esoteric words in normal speech, because my brain is broken and when I reach for a word the filter is just "does this match what I'm trying to say" and considerations like "is this is a normal word or something I've only ever seen written a single digit number of times and that I inferred the meaning of from context?", "is this the correct language?", or "did I just synthesize this word from roots just now?" get skipped over until I've already said it.

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

But you've not showing off.