He's replying to a deleted post but he quotes himself in another thread.
https://bsky.app/profile/paulcrider.liberalcurrents.com/post/3kshh7jqylb2v
this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
67 points (98.6% liked)
chapotraphouse
13473 readers
1 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank
Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here
Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
i can be a moral choice not to vote or to vote but skip over a race. he uses "moral cost" to imply a constant negative value when the value could be negative or positive. more like a moral consequence which can swing either way depending on your set of moral conditions
Yeah my non-participation in this election is more like moral passive income
i got abortion on the ballot and im voting de la cruz
ill skip over races where its two evils