this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
60 points (92.9% liked)

History

5377 readers
5 users here now

Welcome to History!

A community dedicated to sharing and discussing fascinating historical facts from all periods and regions.

Rules:

FOLLOW THE CODE OF CONDUCT

NOTE: Personal attacks and insults will not be tolerated. Stick to talking about the historical topic at hand in your comments. Insults and personal attacks will get you an immediate ban.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Assman@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I thought they already knew they built them out of big rocks

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah from the bottom up, because top down looks much more difficult

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You knever know with those clever buggers!

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hmm yes perhaps with a system of springs and pulleys, one could contrive otherwise

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Getting the stones to the construction site is one thing.

Stacking them up in a pyramd shape, though, is a way bigger problem that still generates debates - and loads of crazy and stupid ideas, too.

[–] craftyindividual@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, top down you'd have to juggle many pieces at once ;)

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But now we know those big rocks can float. I imagine they threw the rocks in the water, attached an outboard and just putt-putted along until they got to the pyramid.