this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
107 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] supafuzz@hexbear.net 81 points 1 year ago (3 children)

can't wait to hear about how Israel has a right to respond to Iran's unprovoked aggression

[–] CommunistBear@hexbear.net 61 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hate that you're right. There will be one news segment where someone mentions "you know, Israel did bomb their embassy a week back" and they'll be called a terrorist sympathizer and blacklisted from media

[–] duderium@hexbear.net 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Given that we’ve now born witness to six months of Israel exterminating children (on top of the decades of extermination before that), one has to wonder how much anyone is going to believe this. And yet…

[–] christian@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago

They already got me, I completely missed the news about the embassy bombing. Happened on April Fool's day?

[–] 420stalin69@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago

The Iranian missiles struck an orphanage in the middle of a military base

[–] thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Attacking an embassy is considered an act of war by International law so Iran is fully within their right to attack Israel if they feel like it

[–] Rx_Hawk@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you know if international law permits declaration of war to stop a genocide? Does the UN have to approve South Africa’s statement for that law to apply?

[–] thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

that would fall on Intervention which is considered illegal in most cases unless its by invitation, request or Humanitarian intervention which i think it falls on since is

the use or threat of military force by a state (or states) across borders with the intent of ending severe and widespread human rights violations in a state which has not given permission for the use of force.

you would need the UN via the ICJ would have to approve South Africa's case of Genocide in order to have an authorized intervension but other countries have use the HI without the support of the UN Security council like during the NATO intervention in Kosovo

[–] Rx_Hawk@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

Okay, so the world has a chance to something very funny and very legal.

[–] duderium@hexbear.net 37 points 1 year ago

Is this another “Russia is about to attack Ukraine” situation? The CIA wins either way. If Iran “attacks,” then people think that the CIA was right. If Iran refrains, then it’s obviously because they’re terrified of Israel.

[–] Dickey_Butts@hexbear.net 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I personally think the consequences would be too great, but I thought that about Ukraine as well.

[–] Tunnelvision@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And just like Ukraine it’s either do it now or submit to the west forever.

[–] Dickey_Butts@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

Yeah I don't think there will ever be a better time to put their foot down.

[–] BountifulEggnog@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Based iran, go off

[–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago