this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
208 points (96.8% liked)

InsanePeopleFacebook

3573 readers
1 users here now

Screenshots of people being insane on Facebook. Please censor names/pics of end users in screenshots. Please follow the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] henfredemars 131 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Guide to saving money:

Start a legal battle with the federal government.

[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] navi@lemmy.tespia.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tax evasion?

Believe it or not, straight to jail.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only way they were able to arrest Al Capone was on tax evasion.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

And Wesley Snipes!

[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Another sovcit has a wonderful answer today.

[–] Laser@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nowhere does it state that the relative can't be killed by you, or that there relative has to be dead in the first place. Very convenient. This should be an open and shut case (the STATE will lose)

[–] henfredemars 2 points 1 year ago

I really hope they don’t try to do this themselves.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 69 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Fun part: Ask them to point to examples of such cases where the state lost in federal court.

[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Maybe I will, for the lolz.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 22 points 1 year ago

Do your own research lazy bones

[–] Lichtblitz@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 year ago

That would work with someone who argues fairly. But with someone, who has the super weapon of "they don't want you to know, so they hide those cases", you won't get far.

I can't find it right now, the government censored my Google.

[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Obviously. Duh.

[–] SamuraiBeandog@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Educate the tax assessor" I'm screaming.

[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

The tax assessor already has a migraine.

[–] bleistift2@feddit.de 44 points 1 year ago (3 children)

‘How does one make their property “private”?’ As opposed to public, as it seems to be now? Dude, you’re paying taxes because your property is private.

[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Aren't they lovably crazy?

[–] Silverseren@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They apparently mean private as in invisible to the legal system and not a part of any public records. Not sure what property has ever worked like that for them to be basing such an idea off of.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you are saying that l just need to make my 1/4 lot with a 100 year old two story an independent country? Sounds good to me. Hopefully I can get Swiss too.

[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

One of their answers.

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don’t want to pay property taxes? Ok here’s all the services you won’t get or be able to use. If you do try, we’ll arrest you.

[–] R2DPru@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m waiting for the list…

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Maybe we should list all the services that they do get.

It's definitely not waste, water, sewer, electricity hookups, or even a certificate of habitability, which the mortgage company would want. Also no police, fire, or access to schools, parks, sidewalks, street plowing/sweeping, tow services for cars parked across your driveway, heck, the city would be okay with removing the driveway access to the road.

I think what you'd get for free is very annoyed neighbors.

[–] onion@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

They also don't actually get any property, because the state isn't enforcing any property rights

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

water, sewer, electricity hookups

These are, in many parts of the US, provided by utility companies and not exactly funded by property tax.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

This is true. Unfortunately, some of those require permits to set up, or if set up, payment in dollars, not forms.

[–] Takumidesh@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are a lot of people who don't pay properly tax and get all of those services, for example, people who rent.

You still pay income tax and sales tax.

[–] Blackout@kbin.run 14 points 1 year ago

Step 1: Sell your property Step 2: Live on the street where there is no property taxes

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Has any of this weird, idiot sovcit crap ever worked?

[–] stinerman@midwest.social 11 points 1 year ago

I think at one time in Nevada (or possibly still) you can get allodial title to property. You don't have to pay taxes on that. However in practice you're simply pre-paying property taxes for a certain amount of time.

IANAL, but I recall this being a thing in a few states.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

At first I read these and laughed, now I just feel sad.

FYI there's a eighties movie where a guy does this, gov shows up. Huge standoff.

Forget the ending and name though :(

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 year ago

Call me when you have your day in court. I enjoy watching morons become befuddled.

[–] Mutterwitz@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Would be funny if there were still some old laws which would let new settlers just legally claim that plot from these "natives" after getting it off the records.

[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

This got me curious if one could buy land in some remote unicorporated area to avoid any tax jurisdictions, but it seems that there would at the very least be county level taxes.

[–] ____ 6 points 1 year ago

MF, i rent intentionally to avoid surprise roof bills and the like, and I still pay my property taxes as part of that. It’s built in, neither owner nor manager is taking it on as a cost of doing biz.

Personally, because I WFH for a giant company, it matters not whether I live in RI or LA. It matters a great deal to me, however, and covering that expense monthly beats hell out of paying annually.

If I can calculate why that makes sense to/for us and our lifestyle, so can these loons.

I absolutely know that one way or another, it will get billed to me. But by not owning, I’ve the privilege of paying it as I prefer and literally (and legally) making the property taxes someone else’s problem.

I don’t have to care, I just pay what I said I’d pay, and if things change and we need to up stakes for whatever (likely political) reason, I can do it without screwing around with house showings and RE agents.

Conscious choice to simplify future bills and problems > blowing it off with bullshit.