this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
-32 points (30.5% liked)

Technology

71502 readers
4129 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

AI telling us string theory is that silly string is safe to eat

[–] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Add glue to your silly strings to weave them into delicious silly rope.

[–] cyd@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Years later, after untold exaflops of computing, the AI's answer appears on the screen: "Dunno".

[–] Evil_incarnate@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] LimpRimble@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Ya, ya, but what is the question?

[–] eggymachus@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Thanks, that was interesting. I kept thinking that this reads like something out of Quanta Magazine, and then at the end there was an attribution to them :)

To all the reflexive AI-downvoters: This is about an application of machine learning, not an LLM. Don't behave like an advanced autocomplete; think before you click :P

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm not a reflexive AI downvoter. I'm a reflexive String Theory downvoter.

[–] eggymachus@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

...can't argue with that

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

Why not both?

[–] Dark_Dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then the author could have written the headline as "Machine Learning" instead of clickbaity word like "AI"

[–] Identity3000@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In defence of the author, there is absolutely nothing about the term "AI" that just means "LLM" in an informed context (which is what Wired portends to be). And then the words "machine learning" are literally front and centre in the subtitle.

I don't see how anyone could misunderstand this unless it was a deliberate misreading... Or else just not attempting to read it at all...

(That said, yes, I do hate the fact that product managers now love to talk about how every single feature is "AI" regardless of what it actually is/does)

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"With four parameters I can fit an elephant, and with five I can make him wiggle his trunk" -- John von Neumann.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What makes up the strings?

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Theoretical physicists

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

String theory captured the ~~hearts and minds~~ careers of many physicists decades ago because of a lack of empiricism ~~beautiful simplicity~~.

Improved that somewhat.