this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
371 points (95.1% liked)

solarpunk memes

3936 readers
33 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 114 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Shitass little kid can't even think of what to turn a tree into. LMAO

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On one hand, I want to mail you a brick. On the other hand, I am upvoting you for your shitposter take.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mail a brick with the force of a comet

[–] RickAstleyfounddead@lemy.lol 5 points 1 year ago

Express mail

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is something we really need to take on: not all value needs to be utility or monetary based. Things can have existential value, too.

Unfortunately we take the former approach with just about everything. We willingly tie our worth as a human to our work performance or some other ridiculous metric. You don't have to be the paragon of project management, or a world famous influencer to be deemed worthy. You are worthy just because you exist.

Trees, frogs, and mosses all have inalienable rights to exist, too. Since they comprise the natural world, and actually perform functions to sustain said world, they have value. Moreso, I would argue, than an exemplar of project management, or bumping up a number on the NYSE. More value than the table we could make from the trees, or the extra bit of space we could use from destroying wetland (frog) habitat.

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Reminds me of this story. The commentary isn't really necessary, imo. The story stands without it.

https://ando.life/journal/the-useless-tree

[–] sir_pronoun@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

..poor little Timmy later got lost and went on to die from exposure in that forest, unable to build shelter.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

He just couldn't work out what to do with the sticks. Insisting the sticks not be moved from where they fell was ultimately the problem, if you ask me.

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Is this by Sergio Aragones? It looks like his style. I did a reverse image search and couldn't figure it out.

[–] bazus1@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Absolutely his style. He a real one.

[–] stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago

Looks like it but I don't know. The site I stole it from had already removed any signature, if there was one.

Definitely Sergio. No doubt about it.

I was thinking it looks like one from MAD magazine, so it must be Sergio.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Dude in the third panel needs to go to the hospital. His leg is bending the wrong way.

[–] rooroo@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

That’s why he’s thinking about furniture, man needs to rest.

[–] AceQuorthon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago

I like how the comic becomes progressively sun bleached

[–] Darukhnarn@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

All of these views are valid. A tree has to be seen for what it can provide. If it’s more valuable to society and nature as a tree, leave it be. If other trees can gain from it being removed earlier than its natural decay demands, I’d argue to remove it.

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This tree is by a path, so it's better to leave it be.

Other trees can be sustainably harvested and made into whatever our society needs.

[–] Darukhnarn@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Depends. Is it stable? Does it pose a threat to passer bys ?

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This implies that only children enjoy trees for their natural beauty, that is just dumb.

[–] athos77@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

I wanna build a tree house and live symbiotically.

[–] nicknonya@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

one will protect you the other will try to kill you

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago
[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago

If they only get like a day of prep time, Carpenter. If it's a longterm battle, the youth.

[–] Johanno@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

I would imagine to set it on fire....