this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
156 points (97.6% liked)

politics

23679 readers
2693 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 127 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

Juror #2 an "investment banker" who gets all their news exclusively from ~~Trump~~ Truth social and ~~Elon~~ twitter. The red hat is there to save the day, hang the jury on some nonsense to protect the cult leader.

If I'm wrong, and the jury convicts, point to this thread and I'll donate $25 to charity.

The observers in the court won't say who it is, but I guarantee its that one.

Edit: I have chosen Special Olympics Canada as the charity.

Edit2: I was wrong, I will make that donation tonight and post the blurry receipt

[–] HornyOnMain@fedia.io 61 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

To balance it out and give to charity regardless of the outcome, I'll donate $50 if you're right. That way there's always something good happening even if it may be small.

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 year ago
[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 31 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Nah. Most jurors are paying attention to the evidence. Trump supporters aren't the lone rebels they think they are. There's literally a mountain of evidence and the prosecutor's closing argument was 6.5 hours long (not including breaks).

Every other person in that jury room is going to want to go home and won't put up with someone stopping them. Even if this dude tries anything (he probably won't), he's going to crack by day 3.

I bet we see a guilty verdict for at least some of the charges within 3 days.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

God I hope you're right!

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

You won the bet, good on ya.

[–] SarcasticMan@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

If you are right I will donate $25 worth of Monopolowa to my stomach.

Edit: convicted lol I donated the Monopolowa anyway skål or should I say dzięki or would it be prost fuck it cheers!

[–] crawancon@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

does lemmy have a RemindMe bot?

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

I had saved this thread! Woo hoo! Glad you pulled through with your promise.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I have chosen Special Olympics Canada as the charity.

Well done!

[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The observers in the court won’t say who it is, but I guarantee its that one.

Are the votes of the jury generally revealed?

[–] Drusas@kbin.run 4 points 1 year ago
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago

"A truly hung jury would laugh Trump out of the locker room."

~ Stormy probably

[–] StinkyOnions@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Hung is something Trump wished he was.

[–] kitnaht@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I certainly wish he was too. Just not in such a nice way :D

[–] ShunkW@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Quirk of English, but the word you're looking for is hanged.

[–] kitnaht@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJVNzwTnfbk

Wrong. Hung is correct in the same manner.

I reject your bullshit English rules that are outdated and churlish.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Chicanerous and deplorable.

[–] StinkyOnions@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s lewd, lascivious, salacious, outrageous.

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I find this meatloaf rather shallow and pedantic.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Be careful with what you post publicly, friend.

I hate Trump, but the SS takes comments like yours seriously enough to trigger an investigation.

Edit: I've been schooled. So it's more like winning the lottery. But is that a lottery you'd like to risk winning, though?

[–] kitnaht@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You're talking out of your ass. Stuff like this is mild compared to what it takes to trigger that kind of response. Millions of people make comments like these on the daily.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Millions, huh? Show me 100,763 examples.

[–] kitnaht@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://idahocapitalsun.com/2023/01/31/of-more-than-7500-threats-against-members-of-congress-in-2022-just-22-prosecuted/

7500 hardcore, actually-directed-enough-to-take-serious threats per year. Now, consider all the maga morons and their constant shit talking across the internet, and it's easy to extrapolate.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not the 100,763 I requested. Checkmate!

But more seriously, thank you for schooling me. I was indeed talking out of my ass, then.

[–] kitnaht@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry for being so harsh with my wording; I live in the south, so I've gotta deal with a lot of MAGA assholes and it's kind of ingrained itself into my personality a little. Also, thanks for looking out for me, I know you were just trying to make sure I wasn't targeted :)

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

No apology necessary. I'd do the same in your position.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Some time back he might would have been for treason.

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

You know what they say about men with tiny hands...

[–] athos77@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago

That's been obvious since the beginning.

[–] Sorgan71@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

I mean I dont see how their dick size affects it but ok