this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
206 points (99.5% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] moonlake@hexbear.net 19 points 11 months ago

Google won't stop the psychological warfare until everybody is that guy from Black Mirror sitting in a cell surrounded by screens with unblockable ads

[–] MineDayOff@hexbear.net 15 points 11 months ago

God dammit. I just got a raspberry pi to deal with this in the home. The so called future sucks.

[–] RaisedFistJoker@hexbear.net 13 points 11 months ago

I will stop watching youtube if i cant block ads

[–] sgtlion@hexbear.net 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's an endless arms race, not an infallible solution. There'll be another addon to block server side infected ads too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I mean I've always been baffled that this wasn't already how it works. It seemed to me if they wanted to make them hard to block this was the obvious answer

[–] iie@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago

only reason i can think of is it might be more computationally expensive

[–] peppersky@hexbear.net 12 points 11 months ago (19 children)

I know I'm encroaching on very dangerous bootlicker terrain here, but it's obvious that a service like YouTube, that lets you upload and watch as many videos as you want and let's users monetize their videos to such a degree that a non-insignificant number of people can live off of it, needs to make money somehow. If you want to see what a service that doesn't have ads look like, look at Vimeo, where creators pay out of the ass to upload any videos at all. And unlike most services YouTube does actually give you an option to opt out of ads. YouTube Premium might be too expensive, but 55% of that does actually go to the video creators. I'll take that a million times over shit like Facebook or tiktok that doesn't give you that option at all.

Use ad blockers, pirate all media, steal shit from the supermarket, it's all cool and correct to do so, but to pretend like this is some new extra greedy move is just ridiculous.

[–] HexBroke@hexbear.net 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

but it's obvious that a service like YouTube, that lets you upload and watch as many videos as you want

Google owns enough infrastructure that the actual cost is much lower than you would expect (hence the significant barriers to entry for any competitors).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] flan@hexbear.net 8 points 11 months ago (3 children)

but to pretend like this is some new extra greedy move is just ridiculous.

I disagree. Google ran Youtube at a massive loss for many many years and effectively killed all competition in doing so. If Youtube had to play by the same rules as everybody not owned by Google the video streaming world would probably be very different today. Video streaming has always been extremely expensive. Youtube has just been subsidized by infinite money from Google Search. They can turn on the ads now because there's no competition.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] iie@hexbear.net 9 points 11 months ago

This will destroy hextube

[–] PointAndClique@hexbear.net 8 points 11 months ago

Anyone who's using adblock plus and getting the YT message, I found a temporary workaround. Basically open it in an extra tab (not active/current tab) and let it sit for approximately the duration of two advertisements (50s) then switch to that tab. 5/5 success rate so far.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›