this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
105 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15897 readers
1 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cosecantphi@hexbear.net 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In 1000 years scientists will find the paint residue and people will appreciate it as an interesting historical fact that Stonehenge was once vandalized by a psyop meant to hurt climate change organizing

[–] Mardoniush@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"Despite our image of Stonehenge as a grey, austere structure, during the late Tupperware/Wrapper Culture at the LTBIIIb-c boundary, local religious cults donned black masks and dyed it a brilliant orange while conducting their rites."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] robinnn@hexbear.net 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

MY TREATS MY TREATS THERE’S ORANGE PAINT ON MY TREATS THEY’RE RUINED

[–] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago

i-spil-my-jice That's just my jice wich i spil

[–] jackmarxist@hexbear.net 41 points 1 year ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Tachanka@hexbear.net 37 points 1 year ago (3 children)

even if Just Stop Oil isn't a "psy op" loaded to the gills with agents provocateurs taking money from an oil heiress and is completely sincere activism, it's fundamentally a reformist organization engaged in theatrics. You aren't going to mitigate the damage of climate change, let alone end it, within the confines of ongoing capitalism.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Delphinium@hexbear.net 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But the fucking rocks are still there just look at them mission accomplished

[–] Tunnelvision@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

Fr just look at them from a different angle

[–] a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

I mean shit, if I was touristing and needed a treat selfie, how much cooler is getting one when Something (minor) Happened, rather than the old boring rocks that everybody has?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] whodoctor11@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (20 children)

I don’t think vandalizing an archaeological site is going to suddenly change Big Oil’s mind. If you want to take down Big Oil, direct action against it is a good place to start. These rich kids just put an unnecessary burden on the working class people who now have to clean up their mess. This self-indulgent shit pisses me off.

[–] bumpusoot@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

These protests do work. And is suspected to be largely behind why a fair fraction of the population care about climate change. And working class people will be pressed into cleaning up the mess of direct action too, so I don't understand the argument there.

Fucking up rich people's pretty shit is a perfectly valid, if somewhat toothless, response. Yes, direct action is better, but is also more heavily violently cracked down on, the mass movement needed to make it viable isn't there.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think the heatwaves and floods and winters without snow are why a fair fraction of the population cares about climate change.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] EmoThugInMyPhase@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It’s not going to change big oil’s mind. Nothing short of torturing executives and hanging their bodies off a bridge will change their minds. But at least this makes people mad which is the next best thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

These rich kids just put an unnecessary burden on the working class people who now have to clean up their mess

So you're saying these protests create jobs?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] EllenKelly@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago

The waiting for two years or the spontaneous decision to visit, the principal contradiction of our time

[–] M68040@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If memory serves they used something water soluble, didn’t they?

[–] blobjim@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I feel like Just Stop Oil's whole thing is doing something completely harmless that still gets idiots mad so yeah.

[–] WELCOMETHRILLHO@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago

People are too focused on the washable paint, not focused enough on climate change, and even less focused on the underground base beneath Stone Henge where Dr. Andonuts and Apple Kid are being held hostage.

[–] Yor@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

this person only found out about Stonehenge two years ago?

[–] Denvil@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago

Maybe, but you can't conclude that from the sentence at all? It simply says it's a place they've wanted to go to for 2 years. I know about Stonehenge, but haven't really thought "Y'know, I want to go visit that," but maybe that'll change.

[–] WeedReference420@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

The most hilarious part of this whole thing is the Daily Mail having to reluctantly pretend to be on the side of the neo-pagans they usually consider hippy parasites because they were mad it interfered with summer solstice.

[–] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

now i want to pressure wash it

[–] chungusamonugs@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

For one of the parasite in chief with idiot hat's many useless celebrations they projected a whole bunch of royal worshipping propaganda onto Stonehenge, so as far as I'm concerned this is far less offensive than that.

[–] EatPotatoes@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

Misdirected anger is one hell of a opiate

[–] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What's with people saying this is a psyop?

[–] Packet@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As far as I know from my memory, it is organized by a bunch of rich kids and also the org gets its money from oil excs, shady stuff in general from their organizing

[–] blobjim@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

it isn't funded by oil execs 🤦‍♂️ don't just say random shit from memory

[–] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

"Saying random shit from memory" seems to be a recurring problem with Hexbear.

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

It came to me in a dream

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's funded by Aileen Getty, whose dad owned Getty Oil (which was bought by Pennzoil who was bought by Shell).

I don't believe she's doing a psyop, just a lib doing what libs do.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] What_Religion_R_They@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The people calling it a psyop are?

[–] What_Religion_R_They@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

every form of lib activism can be called a psyop since they can all be ridiculed by the media. and some actual based forms of activism can be shown to randoms and they will :chud-rage: anyway

[–] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

Can you go into this in more detail?

[–] dead@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's simply not possible that random people who are genuinely afraid of climate changes are doing irrational things out of fear of climate change. (sarcasm) "There must be some evil rational actor forcing them to do this so that they make ME look bad."

Declaring this to be a psyop recenters the narrative around yourself. It makes the narrative not about climate change or people reacting to climate change in irrational ways but instead about themselves. Yesterday it was not even called a "psyop", people were just calling them feds. Adding "psychological" to the narrative inserts the self into the narrative. It's twitter brain.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›