this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
234 points (100.0% liked)

Open Source

31114 readers
1 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CrinterScaked@sh.itjust.works 96 points 11 months ago (5 children)

all public bodies must disclose the source code of software developed by or for them, unless precluded by third-party rights or security concerns

So this effectively changes nothing.

[–] robber@lemmy.ml 54 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Swiss lemming here. Switzerland already open-sourced multiple projects before, most notably the app to store your COVID test / vaccination status in. It was even officially available on F-Droid. I was very suprised at that point, and I'm happy to see that there are now efforts to make such behavior more default and less edge case, even when there are exceptions.

[–] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What's the vibe in Switzerland about the upcoming quarter final against England?

[–] robber@lemmy.ml 15 points 11 months ago

A little overconfident as usual imo

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 26 points 11 months ago

Well it's a good step in the right direction, not a massive difference but still

[–] tristan@aussie.zone 6 points 11 months ago

I'm curious who is the arbitrator for what's a valid security concern or not. If it's done by an independent group, it might make it harder to get around. If it's self disclosed, then yeah nothing will change

[–] magguzu@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't be surprised if there are hardcoded credentials in places and that's enough for them to be able to say they can't lol

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Idk if that would hold up in court. This law is completely dependant on the technical competence of the judges that will use it. It can be worthless, it can be strong.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 1 points 11 months ago

Hey but the PR sounds good

[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I quickly scanned and no mention will gov fund projects they uses. Nice.

XKCD: Dependency

[–] stuner@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

This "new law" was passed more than a year ago... But, it's still a step in the right direction.

[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 12 points 11 months ago