Fairphone

646 readers

1 users here now

Community for the FairPhone
Forum | Code

@Fairphone@social.weho.st

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

testman@lemmy.ml

Fairphone removed OAD for 'better battery life' and other software issues (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Boeddabart@lemmy.world to c/fairphone@lemmy.ml

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Let me start with saying that i love Fairphone's concept and overall products. But... I really think Fairphone needs better software developers/designers, and most likely more of them too. Android 14 came in late, and did not much good in my opinion (besides giving the option to change the 'recent' and 'back' buttons position and improving notifications and calls volume).

Now they are removing features instead of fixing them. Also, the overall UI seems not to be polished very well (part of screenshot as an example in comments). The default launcher sometimes lags/freezes, framerate sometimes still struggle to be a stable 90fps, you still need to confirm your pincode in lockscreen (minor annoyance) and some, IMO, ugly design choices. Have yet to discover if other issues are (still) there, but will probably flash a custom ROM soon.

What are your thoughts/experiences?

all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fairphone 6: We removed the display as it was a major battery drainer, as per our data.

[–] Boeddabart@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

One of the poor UI design "issues" (the top row icons don't seem to fit the appdrawer, gets either a little better or much worse when changing screen/letter size). I already made sure to let them know.

[–] vikingtons@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Could they not use whatever is closest to the pixel ROM as their base image? It would be lovely if they had a formal partnership with GrapheneOS, CalyxOS in addition to that.

[–] Boeddabart@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I very much agree. Would call that a win-win situation for everybody: we get more privacy and better performance, they have more time and money for innovations and releasing more (different) products globally.

[–] vikingtons@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

calyxOS might be a shout for you if MicroG isn't a dealbreaker. We've been on android 14 practically since release.

[–] Boeddabart@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Thanks for the recommendation. I'm not sure if i want to want to continue using Google services at all, since i use my Fairphone as a secondary device. If MicroG is optional, or if i decide i do need some Google services, it might be worth it. First i'll see how a degoogled Android suits me

[–] vikingtons@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess it's optional in the sense that it can remain completely unused / disabled

[–] Boeddabart@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

True. Will look into it. Thanks :)

[–] vikingtons@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

no prob. The developers are active in their matrix room (bridged to telegram). You can find out more there if you're interested.

[–] Boeddabart@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Oh nice, that's great. Thanks again!

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Why are they rolling their own software? Can't they just use stock AOSP with some drivers?

I'm not against them doing something custom, but it seems like a lot of extra work

[–] Boeddabart@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't know. I guess they have some vision about how their products should behave/look, which is a fair thought. It is just not executed very well...