this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
1334 points (94.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

12488 readers
843 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Image transcript:

Calvin (from Calvin & Hobbes) sitting at a lemonade stand, smiling, with a sign that reads, "Trains and micromobility are inevitably the future of urban transportation, whether society wants it or not. CHANGE MY MIND."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 84 points 2 years ago (12 children)

I like how you assume that society will choose to have a future over self-immolation.

[–] Scrof@sopuli.xyz 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Yeah that's a bold assumption. My bet is on "it's going to get progressively worse and never better". I have yet to be proven wrong. Since the day I was born everything's been enshittening with only inconsequential cosmetic improvements (lol technology, what a joke).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (6 children)

If nothing else, car dependency is fiscally unsustainable. We might go kicking and screaming towards the solution, but eventually people will have no choice but to abandon the financial suicide that is making your city car dependent.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 11 points 2 years ago (5 children)

True, and I wish my city would realize it harder, sooner. On the other hand, I just read an article the other day that claims that the collapse of civilization has begun. A lot of societies throughout history perseverated with maladaptive habits after the local environment changed, and thus collapsed. A lot of them didn’t, though, and I hope that we’ll wise up in time.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 48 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I especially like that this format of the meme removes the d-bag that is in the original.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Izzy@lemmy.world 40 points 2 years ago (5 children)

What is micromobility? I am unfamiliar with this term.

[–] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 51 points 2 years ago (7 children)

It's things like bikes, ebikes, electric scooters, monowheels, etc.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] NaibofTabr 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FARTYSHARTBLAST@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] CommunityLinkFixer@lemmings.world 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hi there! Looks like you linked to a Lemmy community using a URL instead of its name, which doesn't work well for people on different instances. Try fixing it like this: !micromobility@lemmy.world

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago

Good job with meme template, everyone needs to start adopting this format and not the one with the conservative fascist chud that abuses his wife.

[–] Hikiru@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago (8 children)

The more people try to "innovate" transportation the closer it gets to going back to trains. Driverless cars, for efficiency have them communicate with eachother, to accelerate and brake at the same time, for example. That's just less efficient and more expensive trains.

[–] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (7 children)

There's a massive failure condition for your example - sure, autonomous cars behave like trains when they communicate with each other to sync acceleration and deceleration, but they can also separate themselves from the collective to drive you to the door of your home. In the train metaphor this would be like you sitting in your own train car, and the train car separating from the rest of it and driving you to your doorstep.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 19 points 2 years ago (13 children)

The future of transportation is no transportation.

How many car miles could be saved each year if people didn't have to go to the office to do their jobs? We were already most of the way there.

[–] austin@aussie.zone 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

That... is silly. Things need to move.

So you expect us to live in a virtual pod with a treadmill and grow all of our own food? And collect rainwater?

Edit: I’m not saying we shouldn’t reduce our need for freight. Growing food in your backyard (half of my yard is good production) reduces the need for freight emissions. And I cycle to work. But drive or fly on holidays, I wish we had a more reliable train network.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SMITHandWESSON@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

Not everyone works in an office. Construction, trades, and utility works still need vehicles to work on and create infrastructure out and indoors.

You'll also have tons of people in rural area like farmers and ranchers that still need vehicles.

That being said most of those vehicles will be electric soon. My company will be moving to electric starting in 3 years.

PS: I'm a utility worker, and we take our work vehicles home foe weather emergencies, so the transportation line is a little blurred for me

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yeah, you still need to transport items, and people that do things with their hands, but surely in most first world countries, these things are a minority of road traffic.

If you can get those chokepoints out the way, from dystopian 10 lane traffic jams to an overcrowded tube train, everything else would run so much smoother.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] utopianfiat@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

mfs in 1923: "Cars will never replace trains and horses because there's whole swaths of the country with no highways or gas stations!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (11 children)

I'm going to make the argument against trains for everything, despite being a huge fanatic for trains.

Trains are the most efficient transport method per tonne-km over land, yes. However from certain operational standpoints trains can make less sense than existing solutions.

When distance between stops for heavy rail becomes too short, you lose quite a bit of efficiency. Trains themselves aren't a one-size fits all solution as there are various types that each need their own form of investment (which is a lot $), when roads are compatible with both personal transport and large trucks with little investment by the transporter (govt pays for road maintenance).

Rail companies right now are chasing profits and neglecting operational improvements. In the US, hauling a long, LONG, old and slow train loaded with bulk aggregate, oil, grain, chemicals is more profitable than aiming for JIT capability that is more feasible with trucks. A complete change in societal incentives is necessary to bring back the usefulness of railway in all types of transport. Second, the North American way of railroad companies owning the tracks dissuades a lot of innovation and new firms from entering the market, unlike the "open road" where there are many competing OTR freight companies. None of the Big Six would like my idea of a nationally controlled rail/track system.

[–] schroedingershat@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

Electric motors are now capable of >90% regen, so the braking energy argument against short stops doesn't work anymore (and the energy during motion strictly less than a rubber tired vehicle with a worse aspect ratio so long as the trip is no longer).

The amount of rail needed for short distance distribution networks could still be prohibitive in regions designed for road though. Even then one could still argue that the total infrastructure costs are lower by moving the destinations slightly given how much roads cost to maintain.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] MrFagtron9000@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (17 children)

The suburbs are inherently compatible with trains and really any public transportation. They were quite literally designed around the car and the expectation that everyone would have a car.

Unless you plan to bulldoze the suburbs and then force everyone to move into higher density areas your anti-car dreams are never going to happen.

Although there are many American cities that could get much more anti-car and public transport would work. LA could theoretically not be such a car city with the appropriate infrastructure built in.

Why are the anti-car people anti-self-driving car? With self-driving cars we could mostly eliminate private car ownership.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 years ago

inevitability the future of urban transportation

I don't know, I think you're forgetting the possibility of us all just dying.

[–] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Nope.

Those super long electric busses will become more popular than trains. They are muuch cheaper to get. You can just send in a new one in case the first one breaks down, etc.

Though we also cant all live nrar these "train stops"?

I dont live near any right now.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.website 10 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Trains can transport higher loads of people though. So ultimately both trains and busses need to be the priority.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 11 points 2 years ago (6 children)

100% depends on where you're going and how far journeys are.

For a small inner city area, a subway is great. For a larger urban area, a tram system. For intercity travel, trains. Out in a rural area, buses would be the way, although more remote locations would need government subsidies to be even remotely functional, and even then it may resemble on demand taxis rather than a scheduled bus service.

No single solution will get you all the way there.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] bouh@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (6 children)

We can all live near a train stop. Roads were built everywhere. Train rails are actually not as expensive to build

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aggravationstation@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I don't disagree but there are two points that spring to mind.

  1. This is an inevitable future, but I think it's very far off. In order to make this viable towns and cities would need to be radically different.
  2. How would large item courier services operate after that modification?
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Can we get light rail and trams in there?

The focus urban transportation is a good one imo

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I would personally bet on boats... (or even fins)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago

Society wants it, companies don’t

That is why we won’t adopt trains and why we haven’t yet

[–] Boi@reddthat.com 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Tbh, as someone living in rural community all i want is decent public transportation of any sort. Like, it would be nice to have trains or escooters but, we don't even have busses ( though that having been said i don't how busses would get out here without it making tarc fare more expensive) or making bikes or scooter ( e or otherwise) a viable option in my area or making walking a more viable option. Admittedly i don't know how they would do the last one but, the others they've been trying to do for awhile. I'm hoping that this not only made sense but, actually was on point.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›