this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
1189 points (99.2% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

5076 readers
5 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 113 points 8 months ago (3 children)

After the election win, I am no longer that certain in how bad of an investment Twitter was for Musk.

It probably helped the Trump campaign somehow, even if not decisive.

And he will probably get billions in AI subsidies which he will partially spend on licensing Twitter content for AI purposes.

[–] chalupapocalypse@lemmy.world 54 points 8 months ago

This was the point all along, it gave too much power the individuals and now he can manipulate it

He didn't lose money, he just bought a propaganda machine. His image of being a dumb meme man may be mostly true but it's also a perfect cover for fuckery

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 48 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah he didn’t buy a social media site, he bought a propaganda platform

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

He did overpay. He could have gotten it for cheaper. Considering how much money he has though, and the other primary investors being the Saudis, it didn’t matter much.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 55 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I used to think Elon was just an idiot for buying Twitter and running it into the ground, but now I wonder if he was completely successful in buying a giant megaphone and making sure it only broadcast his pro-Trump propaganda. What does he care if it's not making as much money?

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 18 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Musk is a useful idiot.

https://www.newsweek.com/elon-musks-twitter-takeover-faces-backlash-over-saudi-financing-1755606

It's not a coincidence, I feel, as it was once a key hub for journalists and Arab Spring activists.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/sep/04/twitter-saudi-arabia-human-rights-abuses

This is why people flocking to Bluesky and not Fedi boggles my brain. Centralisation in the hands of capital is a precarious position to find yourself in if you ever find yourself ever against the state. They now have all of that data handed to them on a silver platter.

\tinfoil_off

[–] ArdMacha@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Because Blusky is a nice and friendly place to be?

[–] Frostbeard@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

He is going to get so much contracts for his other companies, not to forget in Russia since he managed to put a kompromat in the white house

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 8 points 8 months ago

This is very plausible. And an argument for why we shouldn't have the ultra rich. No one should be able to do such a thing.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 47 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Microsoft is already working on it

[–] awesomesauce309@midwest.social 25 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Press Ctrl+shift+alt+win L to check their progress.

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Does nothing for me :>

Why would I need a LinkedIn hotkey?

[–] awesomesauce309@midwest.social 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Pebcak. I have a feeling you’re not truly pressing the windows button :)

Doesn’t everyone? Microsoft seems to think so.

[–] paschko_mato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 months ago

Does not work on Pop OS

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

I'm assuming you mean the super key that some operating systems decided to reuse under a different name.

And uh yes I did press it but why would I use an OS with such a bloated default config? Setting up Hyprland was fun :> (but I never did add that hotkey lol).

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Wait was LinkedIn ever not owned by Microsoft???

[–] WaterSword@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah it got acquired in 2016 for $26.2 billion

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ah if only I had graduated on time I would have experienced the pre Microsoft era.

[–] something_random_tho@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It was the same, shitty experience it’s always been.

Eh, I think there were a lot fewer posts and more resumes when I started with it.

[–] Wild_Mastic@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Uninstalled it a couple months ago, it's completely useless and just filled with ad spam post of companies I don't fucking care.

Also, the fake job seeking messages you get daily and never respond after you contact them back.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 8 months ago

I never liked it because of the security risk (it gives too much information, aids social engineering attacks against you and your employer), but using it with very limited and somewhat misleading information in my profile and it's horrible

[–] ArdMacha@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Did you delete your account? That was the smart move, the day before he bought it

[–] Geobloke@lemm.ee 24 points 8 months ago

Conspiracy theory time. He didn't buy twitter to turn a profit, he did it to control the headlines. For which, he is getting great value for money

[–] kerrypacker@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago (1 children)

But then where will we find out what distant colleagues did 7 weeks ago?

[–] Glitterbomb@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

My occupation includes a ton of boomer field techs. Literally all they do on LinkedIn is hit like on every photo the HR/marketing women post of themselves. It's miserable, I don't think they realize that like gets shared with me. As in, I would have never seen this random photo of a woman in a booth somewhere if they didn't hit like. So my feed is a flood of creepy dudes liking pictures of women, and then an ad for Cisco. I could go back to Facebook if I wanted this.

[–] CliveRosfield@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I don’t think it was a bad purchase after he succeeded in electing Trump.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 8 months ago

This is giving him way too much credit, thinking he's some mastermind who engineered this whole thing. He's very wealthy and addicted with twitter, and started amassing a lot of shares of the company. He didn't really care to own it, and instead tried seeing if he could sway Twitter to benefit him, namely by trying to ban the Elonjet account. That didn't work, so he used his classic 420 joke to say he's going to buy Twitter for $54.20 per share, which was way above market rates. He had to be literally sued to purchase the company, after trying to get out of the deal.

Once he was forced to buy the company, it was the company that assumed the debts, not Elon, so it immediately was performing terribly, and Elon had to cut costs, firing employees, not paying rent and server costs, etc. Nothing was planned out ahead of time, the company is flying by the seat of its pants. And arguably the second most prominent user of the platform, the next President, has a competing platform and is directly invested in seeing that succeed, not Twitter/X.

If anything, both Elon and Trump are the modern epitome of failing upwards, exploiting the labor and systems in place to protect Americans, just so they can make more money for themselves. The fact they're celebrated as much as they are is disgusting.

[–] joker125@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

Musk hedged on turning America into an oligarchy. Will it work? Who knows. However his plan has been to elect a dictator as US president, one that will intentionally crash the US economy so he and his other billionaire buddies can come in and buy every industry for pennies on the dollar.

So thankful for all single issues voters who always fall for the same old shit, over and over again.

Congrat on your signaling. I hope you feel better while begging in bread lines.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

LinkedIn only exist for me when looking for a job, definately not a place to stay, i am alergic to toxic positivity

[–] socsa@piefed.social 8 points 8 months ago (3 children)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Then what will we use?

I admit I kind of miss bugzilla.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago
[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

¿Por que no los dos?

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Nooooo, I use that so effectively at work! I'm a QA director.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 6 points 8 months ago

Why’d he bother? He just bought America so he can run everything into the ground.

[–] auzy@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Not too worried by LinkedIn.

At this point of time though, Facebook is as toxic as truth social, so happy to see that destroyed so s real competitor can replace it

"I don't get it. I keep getting applications from LinkedIn and they are all nazis. Every. Single. One of them.

[–] ArdMacha@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Is LinkedIn not already a pile of total shite?

[–] atro_city@fedia.io -3 points 8 months ago

Not a lunatic.