this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
323 points (99.4% liked)

hmmm

7120 readers
4 users here now

For things that are "hmmm".

Rule 1: All post titles except for meta posts should be just plain "hmmm" and nothing else, no emotes, no capitalisation, no extending it to "hmmmm" etc.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] henfredemars 53 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Forget the X-Y offsets. Spawned building on top of church.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I build shit like this in Fallout 4.

[–] Filibuster_Rhymes@lemm.ee 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This could have been a really cool reno with a better roof line and some vertical siding that tied in the butresses. Instead, it just looks cheap.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

maybe, there wasn't a roof to start with

[–] pixelscript@lemm.ee 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is this another one of those "by law, the addition has to look visibly distinct from the historical structure" renovations?

Same thing that allegedly happened to this one?

[–] Benjaben@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Weird, that one went so far in the wrong direction it circled back around and I kinda like it.

[–] tiramichu@lemm.ee 43 points 1 year ago

Before building work started I guarantee they promised "A tasteful renovation in keeping with the structure's historical aesthetic"🙄

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Better than just demolishing the church, I guess, but they could have invested a little more into the materials and design and made it blend with the original facade better. Don't just build a square vinyl box.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

I hate vinyl siding with a passion

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

there are many churches in Europe who were amputated or completely destroyed by American aerial bombings. Some were hastily rebuilt with cement and these hasty renovations after the WW2 have no architectural or historical value 🤷

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm guessing this picture isn't of Europe. There's a stroad, as well as minivans and SUVs. I would guess this is North America. Probably the US, but that's just because I believe our neighbors to the north have a bit more class than this monstrosity indicates.

#FuckCars

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

gmod object clipping noises

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, please god noooooooooo

[–] Taniwha420@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

... it's hideous.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

Seems to be in North America (license plate dimensions) so they probably did that to maximize the number of apartments while still keeping as much of the church as possible (without necessarily being required to as it is in the UK), would have looked better with another type of siding though...

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Modern architecture is like a corrupting virus

[–] KittyCat@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Oh hey I've driven by that, yeah it's ugly as fuck. It's up in Lawrence Mass

[–] exothermic@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I’ve heard that leaving one wall up like this classifies a construction project as a renovation. I’m guessing this was done because it was cheaper or it’s in a historic district? Idk

[–] CoCo_Goldstein@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I've heard the same. If a property is 'renovated', it retains the same value, tax wise, no matter how much larger the renovated building is.

Not sure how this plays out with a formerly tax exempt property like a church once it get converted into a non-tax exempt property such as a residential apartment building.

[–] kubica@fedia.io 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If that's renovation anything can be called renovation.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

in old towns, unless the construction method itself has historical importance, they just keep the facade and build behind.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wouldn't look so bad if they matched the color at least

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah if you're going with vinyl siding anyway just get the fake brick one

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

that's exactly what's avoided in renovation. What's old and what's built afterwards should be clearly separate.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 4 points 1 year ago

Anyone notice the house next door that’s almost touching the former church? There’s paint on the stone wall and the house”s windows. It’s like the painters didn’t mask anything.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Could be worse... it could have one less floor.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

It looks like shit but it's better than letting all those bricks go to waste. I bet the insulation's pretty decent too.