this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
323 points (99.4% liked)

hmmm

6844 readers
1 users here now

For things that are "hmmm".

Rule 1: All post titles except for meta posts should be just plain "hmmm" and nothing else, no emotes, no capitalisation, no extending it to "hmmmm" etc.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] henfredemars 53 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Forget the X-Y offsets. Spawned building on top of church.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I build shit like this in Fallout 4.

[–] Filibuster_Rhymes@lemm.ee 47 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This could have been a really cool reno with a better roof line and some vertical siding that tied in the butresses. Instead, it just looks cheap.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

maybe, there wasn't a roof to start with

[–] pixelscript@lemm.ee 45 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Is this another one of those "by law, the addition has to look visibly distinct from the historical structure" renovations?

Same thing that allegedly happened to this one?

[–] Benjaben@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

Weird, that one went so far in the wrong direction it circled back around and I kinda like it.

[–] tiramichu@lemm.ee 43 points 10 months ago

Before building work started I guarantee they promised "A tasteful renovation in keeping with the structure's historical aesthetic"🙄

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 21 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Better than just demolishing the church, I guess, but they could have invested a little more into the materials and design and made it blend with the original facade better. Don't just build a square vinyl box.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 15 points 10 months ago

I hate vinyl siding with a passion

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works -4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

there are many churches in Europe who were amputated or completely destroyed by American aerial bombings. Some were hastily rebuilt with cement and these hasty renovations after the WW2 have no architectural or historical value 🤷

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I'm guessing this picture isn't of Europe. There's a stroad, as well as minivans and SUVs. I would guess this is North America. Probably the US, but that's just because I believe our neighbors to the north have a bit more class than this monstrosity indicates.

#FuckCars

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

gmod object clipping noises

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, please god noooooooooo

[–] Taniwha420@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

... it's hideous.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago

Seems to be in North America (license plate dimensions) so they probably did that to maximize the number of apartments while still keeping as much of the church as possible (without necessarily being required to as it is in the UK), would have looked better with another type of siding though...

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Modern architecture is like a corrupting virus

[–] KittyCat@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Oh hey I've driven by that, yeah it's ugly as fuck. It's up in Lawrence Mass

[–] exothermic@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I’ve heard that leaving one wall up like this classifies a construction project as a renovation. I’m guessing this was done because it was cheaper or it’s in a historic district? Idk

[–] CoCo_Goldstein@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I've heard the same. If a property is 'renovated', it retains the same value, tax wise, no matter how much larger the renovated building is.

Not sure how this plays out with a formerly tax exempt property like a church once it get converted into a non-tax exempt property such as a residential apartment building.

[–] kubica@fedia.io 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If that's renovation anything can be called renovation.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago

in old towns, unless the construction method itself has historical importance, they just keep the facade and build behind.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Wouldn't look so bad if they matched the color at least

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago

Yeah if you're going with vinyl siding anyway just get the fake brick one

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago

that's exactly what's avoided in renovation. What's old and what's built afterwards should be clearly separate.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 4 points 10 months ago

Anyone notice the house next door that’s almost touching the former church? There’s paint on the stone wall and the house”s windows. It’s like the painters didn’t mask anything.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Could be worse... it could have one less floor.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago

It looks like shit but it's better than letting all those bricks go to waste. I bet the insulation's pretty decent too.