this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
177 points (100.0% liked)

Hacker News

1920 readers
493 users here now

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I wish the other states could have nice things too

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's kinda the good thing about it. If one state, like CA, can make it cost-prohibitive to do two different ways, then if they want to keep their business in CA, they have to play by the same rules everywhere.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

In most markets. Insurance is essentially state-by-state though.

[–] ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

No, it is not. Not all countries are stupid enough to have so many systems for the same thing. Or be stupid enough to have 3 bids for the provider of the same benefits highly used by many in 1 state (e.g. California’s C-IV, LRS & CalWIN).

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

I bet a work around is having the AI assess things, present recommendations, and then a human “makes the final call” by agreeing with the AI. Of course the human is free to make any decision. But you know how it will go.

[–] BolshoyToster@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago

The orphan crushing machine is prohibited from crushing orphans over the age of 7

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 3 points 6 months ago

Now do banks and all other companies too