this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025
343 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23610 readers
1973 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Representative Glenn Grothman plans to introduce the "Protecting Taxpayers from Student Loan Bailouts Act," aimed at blocking future large-scale student loan forgiveness by limiting regulations costing taxpayers over $100 million annually.

This follows a Supreme Court ruling in 2024 that struck down President Biden's $430 billion loan forgiveness plan.

Republicans criticize forgiveness as inflationary and unfair, while Biden’s administration has canceled $180 billion in debt over four years.

With GOP control of Congress, future forgiveness efforts face significant challenges.

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 109 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I agree: student loan forgiveness should never happen. That's because student loans should not be a thing.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 35 points 4 months ago (1 children)

As long as private universities exist, there should be a way to help pay.

A better compromise is public universities should be free. My state is going that way but unfortunately there’s an income constraint that I exceed. Oh well, it’s a start

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

The compromise will have the same effect, as long as the public universities are still properly funded for the influx.

After a decade of that private universities will either close down, downsize or find a way to incorporate themselves into the state. Although Ivy League might be able to whether decades just coasting on the money they have.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 95 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Y'all are missing the big lead: this stops ANY regulation that costs over $100m. Which is...a good chunk of them. Just monitoring can cost a huge chunk of cash.

What this is, is the GOP attempting to rip the heart out of specifically OSHA and the FDA.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Military? Surely that's costing more than $100m annually?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Ssssh... If they notice they'll carve out an exception.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 months ago

Except it's not.

Here is the full text of this fucking bill

It's specifically for the Department of Education and the criteria is OVERLY broad:

'economically significant' ...[means]... "adversely to affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities."

On the other hand, the way I read this...the enforcement of student loans could also fall under this act. If people who have student loans come together as a class and sue the government that their loan is "adversely affects the economy", maybe this act could actually make loans illegal?

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 months ago

It only affects the Department of Education.

[–] PoopSpiderman@lemmy.world 80 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This country only forgives loans to wealthy people. Look at all those forgiven Covid loans.

[–] b3an@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

This. It makes me absurdly angry. It’s so unfair that people can pull that shit. Students who actually could use this kind of help, are shown we mean nothing. Absolutely nothing.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 56 points 4 months ago

Crazy how we’ve never had a “Protecting Taxpayers from Auto Industry Bailouts Act”, or banking industry, or PPP loans, or oil subsidies, or industrial farming subsidies, or military contracts, or pharma R&D grants, or…

Also: Why would taxpayers need to “pay for it” anyway?

We print money for literally everything else in this list, but when it comes to student loan forgiveness putting more money in the hands of ordinary people, now we gotta figure out a tax plan to get that money back out?

I’ve got an idea: How about we tax the folks that tend to end up with that extra money anyway? The ultra wealthy!

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 49 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Fine, if they want to play these games then let's play. Student debt is over $1.6 trillion. If I stopped making payments individually, the ~$40k I borrowed is my problem. If all of us stop paying, it's the government's problem.

[–] jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not directly. The moment you make that loan it gets sold to a private loan handler

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

Yea, my loans have been passed around a few times. The tactic would still work, because there's only a limited number of federally approved student loan debt collectors

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 42 points 4 months ago

Remember all these rich assholes having their PPP loans forgiven? Oh yeah, I guess nobody does.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 31 points 4 months ago (1 children)

As if student loan borrowers are also not tax payers.

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 15 points 4 months ago

They are likely to be the hughest taxpayers.

[–] PineRune@lemmy.world 29 points 4 months ago

Republicans criticize forgiveness as inflationary and unfair

Just like the predatory student loans they are forgiving?

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Are y'all enjoying your cheap eggs yet? /s

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The Safeway app says that eggs "may be unavailable". Not being able to buy them is kind of like them being cheap....

[–] tmyakal@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago

You're definitely spending less on them.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 28 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Then call it something else, conservatives love doing that. We're not forgiving, we're just unconditionally discharging the loans.

Maybe they'll make the businesses pay back the 757 billion dollars that was forgiven in the paycheck protection program... Not going to hold my breath.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 19 points 4 months ago

I vote we take the politicians who vote in favor of this bill and shove a molten fire poker up their rectums. They're metaphorically doing that to tons of people, so I'd say it's only fair to physically do it to them, regardless of political party affiliation.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 17 points 4 months ago

oh both sides are the same and im sure a dem pres and senate and house would do the same /s

[–] solstice@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I gotta say I'm feeling a little bit better about the election results. They've made it clear they don't intend to do a single thing they talked about, and that it is, was, and always will be 100% about money. So I don't think we really need to worry about WWIII, Gilead, mass deportations and arrests etc, because that would disrupt business and make the billionaires slightly - ever so slightly - less billionairish.

[–] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 9 points 4 months ago

Unfortunately chaos breeds usury. The more fronts the little guys are forced to fight on, the more dilluted their efforts, and the more unified the ruling class can become. The goal is always chaos, obfuscation, distraction, entropy. There are two camps: the social, and the antisocial. While we have to worry about maintaining a functional society, the antisocial are completely unfettered, and free to exploit any and all ambiguities. They are the disease, we are the immune system, and the world is the body. They are unconcerned with killing the body, while we must both fight them, and preserve the body. For this reason we are at a disadvantage. And for this reason they should never be underestimated. Eventually a cough becomes pneumonia, and at a certain age pneumonia is a death sentence.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I believe they are going to raise prices and taxes exactly as they promised.

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 16 points 4 months ago

The GOP really hates the working class.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 months ago

Just like Jesus would have wanted

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 10 points 4 months ago

Another bill can be passed later overriding it. No legislation can permanently block the actions of subsequent legislators.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Fine, then next time just force default with no penalties. Lemon squeezy.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 months ago

Too small to not fail

[–] HorreC@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Nothing for students then nothing for Corporations, they are people too. Everyone pays back what they are given.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Lets see how many Democrats vote Yea, shall we?