Oh hey a Linux furry. Never seen that on Lemmy before
this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
197 points (77.1% liked)
linuxmemes
26469 readers
170 users here now
Hint: :q!
Sister communities:
Community rules (click to expand)
1. Follow the site-wide rules
- Instance-wide TOS: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
- Lemmy code of conduct: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html
2. Be civil
- Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
- Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
- Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
- Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
- Bigotry will not be tolerated.
3. Post Linux-related content
- Including Unix and BSD.
- Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of
sudoin Windows. - No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
4. No recent reposts
- Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
5. 🇬🇧 Language/язык/Sprache
- This is primarily an English-speaking community. 🇬🇧🇦🇺🇺🇸
- Comments written in other languages are allowed.
- The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
- Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
6. (NEW!) Regarding public figures
We all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations. - Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
- We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
- Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Xenia is about as old as Tux, and was proposed as a Linux mascot back in the 90's
She's actually been parr of quite a few memes on here, so, now you're in it too :)
I read the title and thought it referred to Xenia the Xbox 360 emulator which recently gained Linux support, that didn't make sense.
And I thought it was Xena the Warrior Princess and was hella confused
A transfem Linux furry. Completely unheard of on Lemmy.
my pearls.
I still don't know what people use to create services other than systemd
If you're writing bash scripts you're basically replicating a lot of the functionality of systemd but with larger foot guns
The system V init approach did the job fine for a couple of decades—even if the actual service definitions were a glorified shell switch statement as you insinuate.
Canonical did their upstart thing for a couple of years that wasn't too bad to use, personally I'm glad they ended up switching to systemd though.
Abaci and mechanical differentiators did the job just fine for a couple centuries.
Just go back to rocks on a scale we'll be fine
the fuck is this?
"Systemd controversy"
I think the controversy ended 10 years ago. It is crazy this is still something people will bring up from time to time.
Unlike Extended Memory.
I still say you EM users are playing with fire.
I don't get all the hate for systemd. Chop Suey is an absolute banger.
ngl I quite enjoy using systemd
I hace a Xenia sticker on a machine that enthusiastically runs SysD.
Well you shouldn't. Take it off immediately, systemd or the sticker, either will do. She's stated her position on the matter, and you should respect that!
(/jk I'm not actually having a go at you, stickers are cool, and systemd is pervasive)
Was gonna ask what's wrong with Systemd but decided to look it up and I now see why, at least from what I was reading.
It's fine, people will whine about anything.
Ah, thanks for the reminder! As a happy systemd user I sometimes forget how stubbornly resentful some people in the Linux community are that they still try to keep this up as a topic. Then again, maybe this is just a troll?
cringe
Yeah, more like "cringe deez nuts."
fair point
furry
hates systemd
thinks anyone still uses PulseAudio
Three wrong opinions in such a short post, impressive.
calling furries wrong opinions in a Linux community
That's a bold move Cotton let's see if it pays off
How is furry an opinion?
And how can an opinion be wrong?
You can not say someone is wrong hating someone/something, if they do it, it is a fact and if not, it is a lie. And you have no way proving that.
And lastly, thinking that most people use PulseAudio is a supposed fact, which can be true or false, but is not an opinion neither.
But you can definitely say that your opinion is that furry as a culture is wrong, that hating systemd is wrong and that thinking anyone still uses PulseAudio is wrong.
I must add, you have strange opinions…
Well, opinions can be wrong. When someone says an opinion is wrong they don't mean that it's not true that you have that opinion, but rather that it's an opinion you should not have.
And some opinions like any other ideas are just wrong. You are entitled to have them, just as much as you are entitled to be wrong, it doesn't change the fact that it's wrong.
For example "we should change math so that 25+75=100" is an example of a wrong opinion.
“I think, we should change math so that 25+75=100” is an opinion and it can not be wrong since you can not forcefully change opinions of persons that aren’t you.
“We should change math so that 25+75=100” is a fact which can be true or false.
"I think we should ..." is not an opinion, it is a factual statement about an opinion ("we should...) which you have, and thus it's either true or false depending on whether you have that opinion ("it's true that you think ...") or not ("it's not true that you think").
An opinion might be right or wrong if it's an opinion you should or should not have, some of course are neither because not everything in life is just yes or no. Opinions about facts that are false or facts that are true are easily categorized as wrong and right opinions.
"75+25=110" is an example of a true statement and thus a right opinion to have. "We should change 75+25 to be 100" is a false statement and thus an opinion that you shouldn't have. "Pirandello is better than D'Annunzio" is neither true nor false, but you can still think that and hold it as an opinion, like I do, "I think Pirandello ..." is a true statement about my opinion.
In my opinion you are entitled to hold an opinion regardless whether it's true or wrong or neither.
Who defines what opinion one should or shouldn’t have? There is no law or similar to force/prohibits having opinions. If something should or shouldn’t an opening is only defined by the opinion of the person judging. Therfore an opinion can not be wrong, it can just not align with your view.
As I said “75+25=110” and “we should change maths so 75+25=100” are stated facts which can be true or false. “I think, we should change math so that 75+25=100” is an opinion you can agree with or disagree.
“I think, 75+25=100” is not an opinion but a fact the person is saying is not sure if they remember correctly.
Of course you can say my opinion is X while you real opinion is Y, but that is just not wanting to tell what you really think for some reason (e.g. due to fear, manipulation, not wanting to insult someone indirectly, etc.). Then your statement about your opinion is indeed wrong. But not your opinion itself.
BTW. In which universe is 75+25=110?
in which universe 75+25=110
My bad, I meant the 75+35=100 thing, which is a common mistake people make when doing brain math. Just imagine I said 35 in the thread.
Back to the topic. "Who decides..." I clearly said some opinions are neither right nor wrong, if something is subjective, it by definition is neither right nor wrong. "No law to force/prohibit" I also specifically said you are entitled to have wrong opinions, so we can ignore the entire "forcing/prohibiting" conundrum.
Next paragraph. "... These are facts that can be true or wrong" exactly, and when I say "in my opinion is true" this is also a fact (a true one) in which I say " is true" is my opinion, but if "" is actually false, this is a wrong opinion that I shouldn't have.
An opinion is a fact you believe is true. But some facts are false and it's wrong to believe they are true. "Your opinion is wrong" does not mean that "it's false that you have that opinion". Not every opinion can be just wrong or right, as I said multiple times.
I see our disconnect now:
First, I interpreted your “wrong” incorrectly (I interpreted it as not allowed vs thinking a fact is different than it really is)
Second, it seems definition of the word “opinion” is different in your region. In my region, you can’t have opinions about facts that can be scientifically measured.
To give an example, you can have the opinion “all people need to treated the same” but you can’t say “my opinion is that water melts at -10 degree Celsius”
So with that definition, no opinion can be wrong. Since if an opinion can be wrong, it would not be an opinion but a stated fact, or better said what the person thinks is fact.
And applying this thinking to your initial comment, it should show why I was confused about you telling this stated facts are opinion that are wrong.
And now comming back to your initial comment:
In the post Xenia being furry is stated as a fact.
Xenia hating systemd is stated as a fact.
And PulseAudio having issues is stated as a fact.
Which of course can be wrong.
Ah, it wasn't my comment, I don't have opinions on that. I just wanted to bitch about the idea of opinions being inherently correct
Ohh, I see 😆
🫶🏻
Systemd is great
I love Podman Quadlets