this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
290 points (99.7% liked)

politics

24577 readers
2418 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Elon Musk has tentatively agreed to appear on "The Daily Show" for an unedited interview with Jon Stewart, who recently criticized DOGE's federal workforce cuts so passionately he injured his hand during a segment.

Stewart condemned Musk's approach to government efficiency, arguing against indiscriminate firing of federal employees.

The show officially accepted Musk's condition for an unedited appearance.

Despite controversy over Musk's recent email demanding employees justify their jobs, Trump reaffirmed support for Musk at his first Cabinet meeting.

all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 115 points 4 months ago (2 children)

he will cancel cause of some nonsense excuse.

[–] themadcodger@kbin.earth 46 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Wasn't he going to cage fight Zuck at one point?

[–] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 5 points 4 months ago

Celebrity Death Make IRL Remake.

[–] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 37 points 4 months ago

And then call him a pedo.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 81 points 4 months ago

That fucking pussy will back out so fucking fast it'll make Zuck wanna fight him again.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 48 points 4 months ago (2 children)

There is absolutely no way that Musk will go ahead with this. Even if it was contractually agreed that it would be aired completely unedited--which I doubt it can be, Comedy Central network censors would almost certainly have to bleep words out--Musk would come out looking so bad, esp. with a host that wouldn't let him dodge or redirect questions, that he would skip. Muskrat might drink his own FlavorAde, but there's not way in hell that he's dumb enough to do this.

[–] SwordInStone@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

oh, he absolutely is dumb enough

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago

He didn't follow through on his fight with Zuck, even though he swore online that he would destroy him. So no, I think that he is neither dumb enough, nor so completely unencumbered by a connection to reality, that he would actually follow through on being on the Daily Show.

[–] shasta@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

My bet is he shows up for the interview but after a few questions doing his best to spin things his way and failing he rage quits and just walks off stage early. They had better prepare extra material just in case

[–] Embargo@lemm.ee 33 points 4 months ago

He'll claim it's edited and cry... If he turns up in the first place, that is.

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 26 points 4 months ago (4 children)

This is a make-or-break moment for Stewart, because if he ever shows any sort of complacency with Musk when he's face-to-face with the sonofabitch, when he's so passionately against him when he's not, as talk show hosts often do with controversial guests, his audience will punish him something fierce.

[–] Awkwardly_Frank@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

“Make or break?” Jon Stewart is on what is essentially the victory tour of his career. He was so popular in his first stint at the daily show that some openly wondered whether the show could continue without him. He retired from that to work advocacy for first responders, for which he was lauded. He’s back now because even a solid decade away couldn’t make the audience forget his heyday. I’ve criticized Stewart in the past, but even I can see that if he were to flub this interview most would shrug “huh, sad how the greats start to slip as they age,” and tune back in next week.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I’m not hugely versed on American show hosts, but that would seem very out of character for Stewart who seems a bit more earnest than the usual from what little I know.

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's very common for hosts - hell, anybody - to be vitriolic with someone who isn't there in person, and then become all civil, polite and buddy-buddy-like with them when they're around. For example, Bill Maher recently invited that turd Matt Gaetz on his podcast show thing and it was the most nauseating best-friends act you never saw, considering how critical Maher has been of the guy.

Oh this disgusting scene that shows in no uncertain way that all politicians are in fact in the same club of psychopaths, and their public rivalries are just theater.

[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

John has had some pretty direct and confrontational interviews already. This wouldn't be new for him.

[–] figjam@midwest.social 2 points 4 months ago

Part of his brand is that he is authentic in his beliefs. He also has had numerous people on in the past that he did not like personally but was able to have a civil conversation with. I think John could run for president and win but I also think he doesn't want the headaches or he would have done it already.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You don't really know much about Stewart do you?

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org -2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I know all there is to know about Stewart, and I'm 99% certain he won't go easy with Musk. All I'm saying is, if it ever dares do that, I and all the folks who know him will hate his guts.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You just created an extremely unlikely hypothetical to get upset at … why?

[–] Septimaeus 1 points 4 months ago

To setup this thread for his alt account, obviously.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

He will go easy, he won't go at him like people want him to. He's interviewing Musk and there will be a level of decorum and respect because that's what adults do. But the left are such rabid idealists that they won't accept that. But most importantly the right leaning groups will help nudge it along as they always do with fake accounts and memes pretending to be left leaning.

[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Do you just not remember him tearing into Bill O'Reilly? He's destroyed people before, why do you think he wouldn't try to destroy Musk too?

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 months ago

Is this from you several years ago just being angry that he gave Bill a platform? Nothing in there says he went easy on him, and in fact there's plenty of commenters repeating my point that he kicked Bill's ass and it was great television.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I just came to say this. There is no tolerance. Jon Stewart is going to get crucified and pushed to either quit or he will have such a disgust from the reaction that he'll end up hating the left. He's too good at what he does. Any effective communicator must be purged no exceptions

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

This will never happen.

John Stewart has enough sense that if Musk came on the set to shoot him for the good of humanity.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Oh fuck yeah I am so here for this

Hes gonna cry out that it was edited regardless

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This seems like a bad idea... Anyone currently supporting Musk/Trump just believes the lies and has no issue with their behavior. It's essentially impossible for the interview to go so poorly that they'll actually see it that way. It's just giving Musk more attention and yet another platform.

[–] Famko@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

I don't think he can be platformed anymore since everyone knows who he is at this point.

Y'know, due to DOGE and all that?

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Yes, put them on television more.