Theyre adding DRM to videos they don't own. Sounds like a lawsuit
this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
239 points (99.2% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
61800 readers
165 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
🏴☠️ Other communities
FUCK ADOBE!
Torrenting/P2P:
- !seedboxes@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !trackers@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !qbittorrent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !libretorrent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !soulseek@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Gaming:
- !steamdeckpirates@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !newyuzupiracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !switchpirates@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !3dspiracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !retropirates@lemmy.dbzer0.com
💰 Please help cover server costs.
 |
 |
|---|---|
| Ko-fi | Liberapay |
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Terms and conditions. What's yours is theirs.
They do own them, though. That's what happens when you upload content to Youtube. Or virtually any other website, for that matter.
Nope. The person who uploads the video owns the copyright/IP. Seems like they should have say in if theres DRM on their IP.
Yeah but the YT terms explicitly say that you give them a worldwide royalty free license to do whatever the fuck they want.
Content creators have no say.
They most certainly have this covered in ToS. IP law is not about actual creators' rights.
Screw them! We'll build our own peertube, with blackjack, and hookers
Peertube is f****** amazing, But your average windows user isn't going to be able to manage the hosting. And your average ISP blocks standard hosting ports. Then it also requires the users to manage their own monetization.
It's not undoable but it is kind of a steep slope.
You can use an already hosted instance, there is no need to selfhost every service.
I think they were maybe speaking to the peer-to-peer "hosting" part of peertube. If not enough people are contributing to bandwidth, then more falls back to the server, increasing the cost to run it.
Mainly storage. The only reason these free hosted sites can stand up is because they have low traffic. If 0.01% of YouTubers started dumping all their video over there, they'd quickly run the free services out of town.
Realistically, If it were easy enough for everyone to host locally (torrent style) and people paired up with hosting partners for backups, peertube could be an amazing Youtube alternative.
Paying for bandwidth and cloud storage rates for video hosting is pretty much worst case. I'd argue that if you were going to self host anything video would be the most important
I joined it but the main feed was just a lot of NSFW content.... So made it kind of awkward for discovery.
Discovery is a major hurdle. There are plenty of instances that don't have NSFW you should poke around to find something suitable.
Feel free to recommend some!
With good content? That's a hard find :)
Plenty without NSFW though
I frequent https://v.basspistol.org/ but they're mostly music
do keep in mind you can also use their filters
like these on https://vid.freedif.org/
Here are some #PeerTube instance recommendations and a few interesting channels, I'd say: https://tube.tchncs.de/ https://tux-edu.tv/ https://share.tube/ https://video.infosec.exchange/ https://videos.lukesmith.xyz/
Or channels which might be interesting: @thelinuxexperiment@tilvids.com(also has a #Podcast tlenewspodcast@podcast.thelinuxexp.com), @niccolo_ve@tube.kockatoo.org, @vkc@tinkerbetter.tube or @zleap@diode.zone
Everyone doesn't have to host their own instance.
Everyone doesn’t have to host their own instance.
They don't, but how long do you think a free instance is going to last when it starts seeing serious volume. Video storage in the cloud is expensive AF.
Yeah, video storage is what prevents corporations from creating YouTube competitors, and it also prevents decentralized users from competing
and it also prevents decentralized users from competing
It doesn't have to. PT is just using webtorrent. Make a desktop client that links into existing PT instances for discovery and indexing, but have the DHT pull the files right off the person's home box. Every content creator makes a buddy, they pin each other's content. Every content creator stores their own stuff + 1 person.
i've been half-expecting them to roll-out drm for everything including cat videos and shit for awhile now.
We live in hell-world.
Yes. Yes, we do.
Praying for Smarttube
Motherfucker I'd better get started archiving
Wouldn't surprise me if they did this to hamper other companies easily scrubbing videos for AI training
I wanted to archive a few channels, but was stopped by the lack of storage. Guess I'm out of luck as my storage upgrade is a long while away :(
With yt-dlp you can DL the videos at lower resolution / quality, so that at least you can have one offline working copy in the meantime.
Archive.org has a lot of storage.
@SnotFlickerman sure it gets harder with DRM, but they will just make DRM break accessible to anyone..
This is my contribution https://github.com/MalMen/HellYes/
Shatter Google.