So why not Amazon for their shopping system in stores?
this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
305 points (99.7% liked)
Technology
71922 readers
3776 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I think they're pretty different cases.
Amazon's one was essentially a side project for them, likely fully funded in-house using their R&D (research and development) budget.
In Nate's case, it was their entire product. They received funding from investors purely for the AI functionality that didn't actually exist or work. They specifically claimed that it did work, which is how they got the money. They spent all the investor money and had essentially nothing to show for it.
Yeah, investing in a company is investing in the whole company and all of its projects. Lies about your company are only fraud when the lies rise to the level of making a material difference to how a typical investor would value that company. If the lies are about a very minor percentage of revenue or profit, then it's not gonna rise to the level of securities fraud.
A perfectly legitimate question, especially since this misleading approach is precisely why Amazon's Mechanical Turk is named like that.
The Mechanical Turk, also known as the Automaton Chess Player, was a fraudulent chess-playing machine built by Wolfgang von Kempelen in 1770. It appeared to play chess autonomously but was actually operated by a skilled human chess player hidden inside. (Source)
I don't know the answer, but I assume that it probably has something to do with money and power...
I don't think it's exactly the same. If I used MT to label data for AI/ML, that would be one thing. If I used MT to complete tasks and calling their effort AI, that would be fraud.
Yes, that's true. I just find it funny that Amazon named this line of business after a fraudulent device. For some of the things you can do with it, it's probably quite the fitting name.
AGI is actually an acronym for "a guy instead"
I was today years old when I learned this.
In all honesty, if I was told my data would be handled by some guy in the Philippines rather than a black box algorithm, I'd consider that a plus.
"Human-handled" needs to be some a badge of honor.
"organic AI"
That's just I.
yes, but with at least $100M of additional VC funding
lol true!
Lmao it's like Snowpiercer. Exactly like that. The little kid/person in the machinery of the train is the big secret to how the whole thing runs
This is scandalous! We were supposed to get a different kind of fraud!
They even probably worked better than real AI, the shame!
This is literally the plot to Trillion Game.