this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
189 points (98.0% liked)

Global News

4393 readers
236 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.


Rules

This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The White House said the higher tariff is as a result of Chinese retaliation.

Archived version: https://archive.is/20250416092702/https://www.newsweek.com/china-245-trump-tariff-2060295


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] moshankey@lemmy.world 88 points 2 months ago (5 children)

A million bajillion percent.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Indeed. It's at the point the exact number is irrelevant.

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Infinity percent No backsies runs away

[–] moshankey@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Me first! Smoke bomb!

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 4 points 2 months ago

You beat me to it by a mile.

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 60 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It’s fun to watch just how incredibly fucked America is becoming on the global scale.

It’s being led down a path of isolation by a Nazi syphilis infected rapist who acts like a toddler at nap time throwing a temper tantrum because he wasn’t able to get the juice box he wanted.

[–] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 months ago

"fun" like the pejorative "fun", right?

[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It fucks lots of people around the globe. I don’t see any fun this.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

I mean, if the fuckwits had to win at least nobody's going to have any fun.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 42 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Saleh@feddit.org 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Only for goods that the US almost exclusively sourcing from China. So quite a lot of them.

While things like textiles and simple plastics could probably be on-shored to the US in relatively short time, many more advanced products will cost a lot more.

But the tariffs seem much smaller than China deciding to stop selling refined rare earths and products from them to the US and US allies such as the EU. That is going to make the US bleed big time.

[–] HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, what's with the EU getting hit with stray bullets? They are not imposing crazy tariffs on Chinese goods, apart from EV cars which are heavily subsidized by the Chinese government

[–] zout@fedia.io 11 points 2 months ago

I'm Dutch. If China would keep on selling this stuff to us, I guarantee you someone from my country will find a way to sell it to the US. Something called "Dutch east India Company mentality".

[–] graycube@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago

The US is only 4% of the world's population. We may have more US dollars than anywhere else, but 96% of the world is still a sizable potential market.

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 months ago

Title should be "Americans face 245% Trump tariff on China"

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 months ago
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is so far beyond stupid that it's wrapped around, overshot smart, and plunged into stupid again.

[–] BagOfHeavyStones@lemm.ee 9 points 2 months ago

Gonna need more than eight bits soon.

[–] millie@beehaw.org 15 points 2 months ago

This headline is bullshit. The correct headline would be "Americans now face 245% Trump tariff on Chinese goods". No need to spread misinformation about how tariffs work.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Welp when the debt defaults and everyone stops using American dollars or hold their gold here, then better hope we don’t all become forced to use crypto like El Salvador (which is probably the blueprint plan).

[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't matter whether it's a 80% (or whatever it was, basically changes on a whim) or 245%. There is no difference.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It does make a difference. Let's say a thing you need about once a month to run your business was 10 dollars from China. You can get a similar product in the US, but it's 30 dollars. At 80%, it's still cheaper to get from China, 18 bucks. At 245%, it's now 24.50 to buy from China. Still cheaper than buying from the US, but now way more expensive.

I know these are made up numbers, but it isn't that unusual for US made items to be 3-10x the price of making it in 'cheap labor' countries. Also, this assumes there is a comparative replacement made in the US. But many machine parts have no analog or are proprietary, you must buy it from China or end that part of your business.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Your point is fairly good but you need to recheck your math. At 145% a $10 product will be $24.50. At 245% it's gonna be $34.50. And that doesn't even take into account additional federal, state, and local taxes.

[–] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Non-tarrif taxes would apply equally to foreign and domestic goods and can be ignored when comparing prices.

[–] nuko147@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

A post 6 hours old. I give a 50% chance, that the number is outdated.

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You think they laugh at him? They probably laugh at him

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I don't think Chinese politicians actually laugh. They might outwardly chuckle but I doubt they find anything truly funny. My bet is their next move will be to take Thailand. They can't directly invade but they can block exports. Trump is initiating World War 3.

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

wtf they beat the Turkish car tariffs

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 3 points 2 months ago

it was the highest in the world, used to be, before trump

[–] kubica@fedia.io 4 points 2 months ago

I shouldn't be laughing but...

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

All of those numbers mean absolutely nothing. As soon as the price is higher than shipping it through Singapore it's useless.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 2 points 2 months ago

hahaha line go brrrrrrr

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Trihilis@ani.social 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nah, its not over 9000 yet.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

We could call it the BFT 9000.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah because they excempted the main imports so now they can jack it up to whatever to look tough even though they already conceded.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, they walked that back almost immediately. The tariffs are still on everything.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Damn, I can't keep up with this shit

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

That's ok. Neither can they.

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago

Lol we got a fentanyl tariff now🤣