this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
252 points (95.7% liked)

World News

32285 readers
1 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dolores@hexbear.net 53 points 2 years ago (2 children)

here's a compromise, we get rid of all the vetos, and let the general assembly make binding decisions. surely the majority of the world's population & nations would vote in support of Western Democratic interests

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago (4 children)

How are you going to enforce those "binding" decisions?

[–] Dolores@hexbear.net 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)

how is zelensky going to get a country that can veto any motion to give up its veto? it's complete fantasy. i'm addressing the idea russia's veto is unfair or undeserved, but somehow everyone else's isn't.

[–] PupBiru@kbin.social -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

it’s unfair and undeserved but… well… tough shit - deal with it, move on… there’s nothing we can do right now to make it fair

the world order doesn’t bow to fair; the world order bows to strength, and there’s not a lot we can do to change that

… yet

[–] hackris@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] PupBiru@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

we shouldn’t stop striving for better just because the world is in unfair place… historically, things have gotten better and we can’t let doomerism slow us down

hope and work for a better world, but live in the current one

edit: i guess the yet wasn’t anything specific… just things get better, and some day maybe we will be able to right some wrongs, or maybe let bygones be bygones… who knows

[–] hackris@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

I completely agree :)

[–] Maoo@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago
[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 5 points 2 years ago

Attempting to create a Supra National World Government like this would cause most, if not all, of the industrialized nations to immediately leave. Even China would pack up its office and walk out the door.

[–] c0mpost@lemmy.eco.br 37 points 2 years ago (4 children)

It's all about nuclear power. All nations in the Security Council have the power to end civilization with nuclear weapons. That's what this war is about as well, Russia is just showing it can do as it pleases. There can be no democracy with such disparity of bellic power, that's the reason that institution exists and it's foolish to assume Russia could be expelled.

[–] zephyreks@programming.dev 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Then India and North Korea should be on the Security Council 🤷‍♀️

[–] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] ElHexo@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago

Witness my bellic power kim-salute

[–] c0mpost@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You have a point. India and Pakistan are out of the Security Council because they are underdeveloped and are busy having their nuclear missiles aimed at each other. North Korea has at most only a couple of ICBMs and is unable to destroy our entire civilization, even though it can create a lot of destruction with those. That is the most troublesome of nations for the UN, because they don't give a fuck about rules and are slowly increasing their bellic power, thus all the fuss about them improving their nuclear program with the help of Russia. Geopolitics is fun.

[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 14 points 2 years ago

Nah the real reason the UNSC seats are what they are is that they're the winners of WWII.

If anything, kick France out because they did fuck all.

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago

There can be no democracy with such disparity of bellic power

You think it's democratic for other nuclear armed countries to lord over the rest, as long as they're not Russia? amerikkka-clap

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nuclear power is unrelated to the security Council permanent members. They were simply the world powers that won WWII. At the time, many of them didn't have nukes yet.

[–] XbSuper@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

May not be how it started, but it's what it's become.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe -1 points 2 years ago

It is, however, one of the reasons people occasionally agitate to remove Russia because it wasn't Russia that won WW2.

It was the USSR, a major component of such being Ukraine.

[–] TerminalEncounter@hexbear.net 25 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I dunno how they're gonna go about that considering Russia could just veto that attempt to strip them lol and citing PRCs permanent security councils seat is just silly.

[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago

There is, however, precedent: the UN General Assembly in 1971 stripped Taiwan of the veto power it held as the representative of China, handing it instead to the communist government of the mainland.

Strip Russia of its veto power and give it to the PRC. Xi can have two vetoes, as a treat.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because that is not Russia's seat. It's the Soviet Union's seat. They left the Soviet Union in 1990. In fact, Ukraine left after them, so they have a better claim to the UN seat.

[–] dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 years ago

That argument might have made sense if it were being made in like 1992 but it's been Russia's seat for over 30 years

[–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's discouraging to hear that the President of Ukraine understands how the UN works about as well as the average redditor.

[–] mtchristo@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

He never stopped being a comedian this Zelensky

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

I am going to guess that Russia would veto that resolution...

The only way to get rid of the veto powers would be to setup a completely different institution. That would be nice but it will never happen.