this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
99 points (99.0% liked)

Privacy

6091 readers
59 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The biggest lie of all websites. There are websites, that if you want to use them, you MUST agree to ads and tracking, or you MUST pay a subscription to be free (no ads and no tracking). This is disgusting, this is REALLY disgusting.

Edit: I should add an example. transfermarkt.pl and their Content Pass for 3.99€ per month.

all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Donut@piefed.social 11 points 3 weeks ago

At least with "We value your privacy" they are a bit more honest

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Not my web site.

Our privacy policy is one paragraph long. We don't share any information with anybody. And if we can at all help it, we don't collect any identifying information on you whatsoever. In one case we can't help it -- If you actually buy something, you're going to have to admit your name, contact information, and shipping location to us. Other than that, I literally could not give less of a flying fuck.

My analytics are interested in what users are doing in general, not what a particular merely pseudoanonymous individual is doing specifically.

We have a spam... ahem, email marketing list, also. I'm astounded at the proportion of users who deliberately check that check box that says, "Yes, please send me spam." (It's unchecked by default.) The month before last I didn't have anything particularly compelling to market, so I didn't spam anyone on our list.

I realize the way my particular business operates is a minority, but there it is. (Oh, so you have an Etsy shop or something and you're pretending to be Mr. Big Time Businessperson, you say. Er, no. We did $5.4 million in sales last year, a significant portion of which was online.)

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Does it literally say, "Yes, please send me spam"?

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It does, but in mildly corpo-speak:

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Amazing. We really have been conditioned to check off every god damned box without reading them just to get past sign up screens, haven't we?

[–] LemUrun@pawb.social 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I wasn't implying your website. First example I can think of is transfermarkt.pl and their Content Pass for 3.99€ per month.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

I didn't say you were. I was just mentioning that there are still a few stalwarts out there actually trying to do it right. Admittedly, probably not many.

[–] Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Best I can do is implement ad and tracking blockers (currently use AdGuard Home, many blocklists, DuckDuckGo, Brave debloated and uBlock Origin across various devices), enable the browser setting that sends a Do Not Track request, and not use the website, instead searching for the title keywords to find a non-invasive article if I really care about it. With every weapon there is armour to counter it. But you're right - you shouldn't need to armour up to traverse the web or read a potentially important piece of news. Some part of the internet should be free.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 10 points 4 weeks ago

A lot of websites plainly ignore / do not respond to DNTs.

So it's like asking: "Hey, could you pls respect my privacy by not tracking me?"

And they: "No, because we care about your privacy. 🙂"