this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
172 points (97.3% liked)

Mildly Interesting

20562 readers
427 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] greybeard@lemm.ee 59 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

"Scientist finally realize most people have smooth brain"

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

When they figure out how to blame ghosts we'll get this shit fixed in a year.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 week ago

isn't it obvious? it's the buildup of ectoplasm in the atmosphere that's causing the warming!
we need to send a pair of plumbers to go unclog purgatory so the souls of the dead can leave the mortal realm once again

[–] RegularJoe@lemmy.world 37 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

The reason I think this is mildly interesting is that the article's main revelation is to just make the data a "this or that" presentation. They aren't changing the information, they're merely changing the presentation of how the data is displayed to get people to see what the scientists are seeing. It's literally a "Keep It Simple, Stupid" approach.

[–] techt@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Angela Collier has some great thoughts about the shortcomings of scientific communication with the public in general -- I think this is the video. Can't recommend her enough, wonderful breakdowns of very complex topics in a way that doesn't make me feel dumb.

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

Discovered her recently, I think through a video that was a more nuanced take on Feynman that showed up on my feed, and been loving her videos ever since. Highly recommend her takes on science.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 week ago

scientists discover propaganda
this really shouldn't be considered a new thing, people have been weaponizing presentation for centuries

[–] Zero22xx@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago

We just need to get clergy on board and telling their congregations that the magic man under the ground is trying to conquer the realm of Earth and expand hell (that's why it's getting so hot), and that the magic man in the sky would really appreciate if everyone would stop making the magic man under the ground's job so easy.

We need to stop using big sciencey words like "climate", "change", "global", "warming", "weather", "melting", "ice" etc. and use words that they understand like "demons", "hell", "bad juju" etc.

[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Liu worked with professors at Princeton to test how people responded to two different graphs. One showed winter temperatures of a fictional town gradually rising over time, while the other presented the same warming trend in a black-or-white manner: The lake either froze in any given year, or it didn’t. People who saw the second chart perceived climate change as causing more abrupt changes.

The findings suggest that if scientists want to increase public urgency around climate change, they should highlight clear, concrete shifts instead of slow-moving trends. That could include the loss of white Christmases or outdoor summer activities canceled because of wildfire smoke.

Previous research has found that as the climate warms, people adjust their sense of what seems normal based on weather from the past two to eight years, a phenomenon known as “shifting baselines.”

[–] match@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago

smoke cancel culture smh

[–] match@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago

so, radicalization?