this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
654 points (99.1% liked)

Comic Strips

16718 readers
1653 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 90 points 1 week ago (3 children)

uses a fire spell while on the fire stick

Natural selection at work.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Use firebolt, because it cannot ignite anything worn or held.

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If the stake is bigger than you are, is it wearing YOU? Can inanimate objects wear things? Does a mannequin wear clothes? Hmm. I think somebody spiked my raisin bran.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, yes, yes, and was it the purple box? Because also yes probably that was me.

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Not again, themeatbridge! We talked about this. Stop putting drugs in my cereal!

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They are not wearing the rope or pole any more than they are wearing the platform they are standing on.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd argue they are holding the pole, but point taken. The platform is still flamable. Did you want to use that inspiration token?

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They are tied to the pole, not holding it.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I would be holding onto the pole, especially if it meant I could cast firebolt and not have it catch fire.

[–] gaterush@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I thought those were blobs of nacho cheese

[–] Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

Molten cheese is no joke. That's at least 3d6 damage. At least.

[–] mmddmm@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

You don't know if she had cast fire-invulnerability on herself earlier...

[–] egrets@lemmy.world 72 points 1 week ago

I like the suggestion that the witch hadn't cast a spell before this point because they thought it was a social faux-pas. Confrontation anxiety strikes again.

[–] ArchaicFury@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

As a Scandinavian, the last frame is super confusing. The eel what now?

[–] lime@feddit.nu 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

ål he røsöxni

Ål, he rösoxarna

Eel, [generic movement verb, approx. "put"] [the] cairn-oxen

basically, she's asking a guy named Eel to move the cows that are stood on the pile of stones, in a bad accent. considering the use of the word "he" it's gotta be in the north of sweden, and going by the letters, the village is bordering norway. for proper form it should probably be "he bort" but she's obviously in a hurry.

then again substituting o for ö is something i associate with värmland. maybe she's not originally from there.

[–] BennyInc@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

Her hovercraft is full of eels.

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago