this post was submitted on 16 May 2025
23 points (84.8% liked)

Games

38929 readers
891 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Dremor@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Dremor@jlai.lu
modfxomt@lemmy.world
23
Microsoft's Xbox Handheld: Switch-Like Dock and Multi-Platform Support (gamerant.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by onurcelik@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world
23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Microsoft’s upcoming Xbox handheld, likely releasing by 2027, may feature a Switch-style docking system, allowing both handheld and TV play. Reports suggest two handheld projects: one by ASUS (possibly 2025) and a "true" successor by Microsoft (2027). The latter may use Qualcomm chips, support games from Microsoft Store, Epic, and Steam, and could even run PlayStation titles—a first for Xbox. However, details remain unconfirmed. Release timelines vary, with some pointing to 2027 and others to 2028.

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Justdaveisfine@midwest.social 23 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This feels weirdly too late. I can't imagine that many people in 2027 who passed on a Switch 1/2, SteamDeck, supposed other upcoming handhelds, or the ROG Ally and are looking for a gaming handheld with money to burn.

Xbox has to really bring something hot to the table, and its certainly not whatever they've been doing with their hardware/games/IPs for the past 5 years.

[–] simple@lemm.ee 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

That's like saying people won't be interested in new laptops because they already own one. If new handhelds are more performant and power efficient, there will be demand for it.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

With a Qualcomm chip though… there will be some teething issues, best case.

[–] simple@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well the rumored Qualcomm handheld is still two years away assuming it doesn't get delayed. Qualcomm's next generation of chips are expected to be alot better, and Microsoft have been improving their x86->arm translation layer lately. It's too early to tell if a qualcomm handheld is a bad idea.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I will believe it when I see it. I hope so.

Qualcomm makes a lot of hype/noise but historically tends to overpromise, and also makes some unforced blunders. But a real ARM competitor would be great.

[–] Justdaveisfine@midwest.social 4 points 2 weeks ago

True, though people tend to replace laptops when they fall out of support or start having hardware issues, much less often to do an upgrade looking for more frames.

I still feel Microsoft has to bring something hot to really sway anyone over since they have a long history of competing in the mobile hardware space and fumbling it hard.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Allegedly, it's an improved Windows experience so you get the compatibility without having to use a desktop operating system on a handheld game machine. So, you get Game Pass and kernel level anti cheat games with a UX similar to the Steam Deck (ish). And besides, "everything is an Xbox". They don't care how many of these things sell as long as you're on Game Pass or buying their games.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago

Let's all call their bluff and buy none of them to see how much they care.

[–] Justdaveisfine@midwest.social 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So it'll be the ROG Ally but 'better' because its less Windows than normal. Hmm.

The last part concerns me. Why am I buying into a platform that Microsoft couldn't care less if it sells at all because they make their money from subscriptions?

People don't want hardware that just gets abandoned when its not profitable enough, which Microsoft absolutely has a history of doing.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Every time you buy a PC, you're buying a platform that Microsoft couldn't care less if it sells at all, and that's all this will be. It will be supported by Microsoft as any other Windows PC, for better or worse.

[–] Justdaveisfine@midwest.social 3 points 2 weeks ago

Well a Windows license is just that: Here is a code for the OS, have fun. They don't care because most support will be from hardware vendors.

Microsoft hardware is a different beast. You need to have parts for replacement, its got to be compatible (and stay compatible) with whatever accessories are coming out, and its got to be better than its competitors on new game launches. That last part takes coordination and support with dev teams.

Don't care isn't a great option, unless Microsoft wants another Windows Phone or Zune or one of the many other failed hardware launches they've had.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago

Allegedly

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Using Qualcomm chips

Oof.

Why didn’t they go AMD, or heck, even Intel? They have GPU-heavy APUs in the pipe that would mostly just work.

Intel, in particular, is not bad power-wise as long as they aren’t clocking chips to very edge like they’ve been doing, and won’t necessarily have the TSMC capacity constraint. That’s huge.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean choosing Qualcomm means they're targeting Arm chips, which Intel and AMD don't make.

It would probably mean a longer battery life, but I'm not sure how that would work for backwards compatibility and power.

If that's true though, it would really set this device apart from the competition.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

It means emulation with pretty much every current title, and graphics driver issues and sluggish game out of the wazoo (as Qualcomm is very different than AMD/Intel/Nvidia).

ARM being more power efficient is also kind of a meme. Intel/AMD can be extremely good when clocked low (which they can do since there’s no emulation overhead), with both the CPU/GPU. Apple just makes x86 look bad because they burn a ton of money on power efficiency, but Qualcomm is more in the “budget” space. No one is paying $2K for an Xbox handheld like they would for an Apple product.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, I know it would mean emulation, the question is more if they can deliver. Since they state it will work with all Microsoft, Epic, and Steam games. Assuming any of the leaks are right.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Games are complex. Qualcomm/MS may tune it for the most popular titles, but I just don’t see how they can catch up to years of desktop GPU driver development.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, that's exactly what I was thinking.

[–] Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I honestly thought the entire point of the Series S was that they would later be able to shrink it down into a portable device without any game patches

Call it the "xbox series s" without capitalization lol, Microsoft loves confusing names, right?

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, that would be perfect!

Or (alternatively) they could majorly underclock the a shrunken series X chip to make it equivalent to an S.

[–] commander@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

I never get the mind blowness some people get about a hypothetical future Xbox branded handheld that could runs all these stores that can play PlayStation games. It's a PC. You can play PlayStation games on Windows devices for years now. It's not a gotcha big brain strategic masterpiece on Microsofts part. Pay Valve to play PlayStation games. Current Xbox gamers in the future pay Valve to play 3rd party games rather than Microsoft