Basically they want rivers to be compatible with RFK Jr., right?
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
Compatibility testing is expected to take up a large fraction of rifkij's time. We'll need to soak him in ALL these polluted rivers he is creating across the US. smh.
Properly treated to remove contaminants? Sure! That would be great!
Dan Mueller, an engineer and a produced water expert, agreed that there is not enough data to issue permits. Mueller raised concerns about the capability of the treatment technologies, saying the five pilot projects have not been running long enough to ensure they clean the water reliably.
Oh, they're only "treating" it.
Yeah! "Treating" it like it's clean!
They say it is safe but say they won't release it unless they are essentially given immunity.
We can trust them, right?
I mean, these big oil companies haven't lied to us yet, or fucked over rural communities.
Why would they start now?
I'd be upset, but this is Texas's water. I say go for it.
Anxiously awaiting a photo of a delighted Governor Greg Abbot consuming a tumbler full of that sordid refreshment
Thought one of the points of Fracking was using this stuff to do the Fracking. If its not safe or useful for shoving back into the ground to force more fossil fuels out, then why the hell would we put it in the water supply!?
Texas right ?
I say have at it.