this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
91 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6581 readers
279 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Oil and gas companies are seeking legal shelter as Texas comes closer to using waste brine once considered too toxic for anything other than fracking to replenish Texas’ water shortages.

Legislation filed by state Rep. Drew Darby, R-San Angelo, could give them, transportation companies and landowners such protection.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mihies@programming.dev 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Basically they want rivers to be compatible with RFK Jr., right?

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 3 points 4 days ago

Compatibility testing is expected to take up a large fraction of rifkij's time. We'll need to soak him in ALL these polluted rivers he is creating across the US. smh.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Properly treated to remove contaminants? Sure! That would be great!

Dan Mueller, an engineer and a produced water expert, agreed that there is not enough data to issue permits. Mueller raised concerns about the capability of the treatment technologies, saying the five pilot projects have not been running long enough to ensure they clean the water reliably.

Oh, they're only "treating" it.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 3 points 4 days ago

Yeah! "Treating" it like it's clean!

[–] sartalon@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They say it is safe but say they won't release it unless they are essentially given immunity.

We can trust them, right?

I mean, these big oil companies haven't lied to us yet, or fucked over rural communities.

Why would they start now?

[–] Roopappy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I'd be upset, but this is Texas's water. I say go for it.

[–] griff@lemmings.world 7 points 4 days ago

Anxiously awaiting a photo of a delighted Governor Greg Abbot consuming a tumbler full of that sordid refreshment

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Thought one of the points of Fracking was using this stuff to do the Fracking. If its not safe or useful for shoving back into the ground to force more fossil fuels out, then why the hell would we put it in the water supply!?

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 days ago

Texas right ?

I say have at it.