this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
9 points (90.9% liked)

Xbox

5738 readers
9 users here now

An Xbox community for Lemmy!


UNIVERSAL XBOX SUBSCRIBE LINK - CLICK HERE

Click this to open this community in your Specific Instance, then click Subscribe


Rules:


QUICK START GUIDE AND RULES:

New to Lemmy?

View the Getting Started Guide

Community Finder


Attributions:

Xbox Logo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:XBOX_logo_2012.svg

Banner : https://www.xbox.com/en-us/wallpapers/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Take-Two boss Strauss Zelnick has discussed the hot-button issue of pricing in the video game industry, saying prices have consistently gone down over the years, adjusted for inflation, while also claiming the company is not attempting to nickel and dime players to maximize profits.

Speaking to GI.biz, Zelnick said his ambition is for people who buy Take-Two's games to feel like they're coming out ahead in terms of the value proposition.

"Our job is not to turn a consumer upside down, shake them, and see how much change comes out of their pockets. Our job is to create the very best entertainment. If we do that, the revenue will take care of itself," he said.

Not everyone would agree that Take-Two is executing against this directive, as 2K's annual NBA 2K franchise is criticized every year for its ubiquitous microtransactions. Despite that, sales of NBA 2K25--the newest entry--are strong, reaching nearly 10 million units, Zelnick said.

Take-Two currently makes most of its money from what it calls "recurrent consumer spending," which includes revenue from virtual currency, add-on content, in-game purchases, and in-game ads. For Take-Two's latest quarter, revenue from recurrent consumer spending jumped by 14% and made up 77% of Take-Two's entire net revenue. NBA 2K25 was one of the top contributors in this department.

Also in the interview, Zelnick discussed the current pricing environment for video games, with companies like Nintendo and Microsoft beginning to charge $80 for new games. Zelnick said when adjusted for inflation, pricing for new releases has declined for the past 20 years. Indeed, $60 in the '90s is about $80 today, adjusted for inflation.

Zelnick declined to say if Take-Two will follow suit and begin charging $80 for new games, but instead spoke about how his aim is to "maximize the value being delivered, and then offer that value at a meaningfully reduced cost."

"That's our job. I do think that the value that is offered is massive and growing, and that is our job," he said.

On the subject of Mafia: The Old Country bucking the trend and selling for $50, Zelnick said this was an intentional pricing decision made with the aim of getting the game "into as many hands as possible." The Old Country is a linear, non-open-world title that doesn't require a massive time commitment. 2K has said it believes there is an audience for just such a game.

Another upcoming 2K game, Borderlands 4, launches in September but has no price as of yet. Gearbox boss Randy Pitchford said even he doesn't know what the price will be.

GTA 6 launches in May 2026, and many are expecting it to sell for a higher price point, though not everyone agrees that it will be $100. According to industry experts, the data shows that people are already embracing paying more for video games, which may help explain why Nintendo and Microsoft were the first to move to higher price points. Sony has warned it might raise prices, too.

This guy is hilariously out of touch.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DonkMagnum@lemy.lol 1 points 1 day ago

"Prices have come down relative to inflation" might sound reasonable, but it's a lie. Unit prices come down in all growing industries, as market base grows and economies of scale improve, more people train for careers in the field bring reduces labour competiton and therefore wages. They also aren't costing in micro-transactions.

The bigger the studio and the more sales they achieve, the lower their costs ... indies and small studios no doubt need to charge a higher price; but studios like 2K and EA could obviously be charging less.

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

while also claiming the company is not attempting to nickel and dime players to maximize profits

I'm sure all those GTA Shark Cards and NBA2K coins are real value for money for the kids buying them.

[–] AlexanderTheGreat@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I know. It's bloody hilarious how ridiculous this is.

[–] Sixtyforce@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] AlexanderTheGreat@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

And yet our dollars buying power has fallen significantly in this time. Doesn't look as good for them when you take that into account though.

[–] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They also had much higher distribution costs and a much smaller audience back then, so even if prices have gone down since the late 70s, profits haven’t.

Pac-Man was the best selling Atari 2600 game and it sold 8 million copies. Mario Kart on the Switch, by contrast, has sold over 60 million copies. A mere 1% of PC game sales are physical and a mere 16% of console game sales are physical.

[–] Sixtyforce@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Development costs also vastly differ over time. We started with Atari games sometimes being shat out in a week by a single person, to at most 12 months of development time.*

To this, with MUCH bigger teams:

https://spritecell.com/bp12-video-game-development-time/

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's been their choice, not ours. Do we need games costing hundreds of millions in development? Does every single game need to be the latest and most advanced thing ever? No. But they chose to, and now this one is pissed that people don't like paying so much for games, well, suck it up, buttercup, spend less doing games.

I'm with this definite human on this one. Indie teams are putting out quality games for a fraction of the price and time. AAA games are stuck in the mindset that looking good = good game. If it isn't cutting edge it isn't worth it. That's on them.