this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
42 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

11666 readers
1370 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 5 points 2 days ago

*corruption

[–] lgsp@feddit.it 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I wonder how different this is from what is the normal way of doing things in the Netherlands

[–] BenjiRenji@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

True, it's a bit Swiss-focused where they have a lot of money for infrastructure, but where cities have mostly invested in cars and pedestrians, but not cycling.

Nevertheless I believe there are lessons in there that can be useful. Maybe not in Amsterdam or Copenhagen, but less bike-friendly places that want to change that.

[–] lgsp@feddit.it 4 points 2 days ago

I mean: i found it very interesting that they have a small set of fundamental rules

  • Half of the road space would be reserved for slow traffic
  • all places still reachable by car.

and based on this they realized what the outcome would be.

So my point is like: do they have a similar set of fundamental rules in the Netherlands? how different is the outcome if the Swiss study applied those? For example, as pointed out in this article,

good quality cycle paths should be a maximum of 500 m apart and that extra cycle-paths should fill in the gaps

Anyway I do think that the link you posted is a very interesting study