this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
42 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

90 readers
167 users here now

Share interesting Technology news and links.

Rules:

  1. No paywalled sites at all.
  2. News articles has to be recent, not older than 2 weeks (14 days).
  3. No videos.

To encourage more original sources and keep this space commercial free as much as I could, the following websites are Blacklisted:

Encouraged:

founded 1 week ago
MODERATORS
 

Google is testing removing the site names from the search result snippets and just showing the site's URL at the top - title link - position of the snippet.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] N4kt0@lemmy.zip 20 points 2 days ago

And I’m testing removing Google from my web search tools!

[–] warm@kbin.earth 18 points 2 days ago

I actually don't hate it. It makes people be more aware of the actual URL they are visiting again like it used to be, could help with phishing.

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

As long as it's showing the true url, I like the change.

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why tho? At a wild guess, site names might hide fraudulent sites, but still seems odd.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Seeing both the site name and the web address being consistent is a green flag for me. Only seeing one or the other would be a downgrade.

Making the address more prominent would be a better way to focus the attention on the address.

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah, completely agree, I just can't think of any other remotely plausible reason for testing the change. Could just be change for the sake of change :/

Edit: maybe to combat title abuse, e.g. Change the website title to ">>> Click here for penis pills<<<" to get idiots to click?

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Google has gone full on evil, so there must be something malicious behind it.

Maybe they want the businesses with abbreviated names to be clicked on less than spam sites that have full names.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

The shit must infitafy

[–] kruhmaster@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] BallShapedMan@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Same! I just haven't found a way to tell people to "DDG it" that flows as easy as "Google it." I've tried "Internet it" and so on... Any suggestions?

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

"Just duck it, duck everything."

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

duck duck go is somewhere between a lot of people waiting to be bought out and controlled opposition.... use SEARXng

[–] kruhmaster@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

Always a hater

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

I like it!

Put the focus on the URL, not the title!

[–] rob299@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yeah, like that's gonna convince the normies to click on independant search results. This will make anything that's not Youtube, X or Bluesky not get as many clicks on search resualts I believe. Because now everything will look and feel more sketchy to the average internet user. Google really wants users to stay on Google.