this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
100 points (100.0% liked)

Actually Infuriating

593 readers
116 users here now

Community Rules:

Be CivilPlease treat others with decency. No bigotry (disparaging comments about any race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexuality, nationality, ability, age, etc). Personal attacks and bad-faith argumentation are not allowed.

Content should be actually infuriatingPolitics and news are allowed, as well as everyday life. However, please consider posting in partner communities below if it is a better fit.

Mark NSFW/NSFL postsPlease mark anything distressing (death, gore, etc.) as NSFW and clearly label it in the title.

Keep it Legal and MoralNo promoting violence, DOXXing, brigading, harassment, misinformation, spam, etc.

Partner Communities

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 

If you Wonder, yes, it's That Insurance Company with that "former" CEO.

He totally deserved what happened to him

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 hours ago
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 26 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

There's been lots of talk about United killing people through their abhorrent practices and delay tactics.

But this is literally murder.

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

jury nullification. do you think Sherwood would convict Robin Hood?

edit - i'll leave it, but i feel like i just said something stupid. it's been a long time since i've read the story. have at it.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I'm saying that conspiring with PAs and NPs to falsify medical records with the specific intent to make sure people die is literally murder.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Feds can't prove luigi did lol

Maybe if they can prove it, we can talk jury nullification but so far the man is not guilty and being shameless smeared by the entire regime and their whores

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

practical hope is knowing that trials like this take longer than election cycles.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 2 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Do you think change [of] the white house regime whore gonna change the regimes approach re Luigi?

I don't think it will tbh

They change [the] sock but it is the same hand and daddy owners big mad their whore got wacked like that

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago

I may need to read that again. I felt there were words absent.

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

yeah, you're right, but here's what i see:

  • option 1: judged and executed under this regime
  • option 2: tried, judged, and sentenced

not to say it'll be fair, but at the very least it could be legal

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 12 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Why does United have or need access to patient DNR status? That has no bearing on processing payment for medical services.

[–] NONE_dc@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

To do shit like this I guess.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 13 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Wow, two horrific scandals in one week..it's a disgusting company

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 2 points 7 hours ago

I cancelled that company as soon as they lost their ceo, and went with another company, which may not be any better. But at least my current company isn't killing people remotely with DNRs. gah!

[–] NONE_dc@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

There's another scandal I'm not aware of?!

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

It's related, they were also giving bonuses to not send patients from their nursing homes to the hospital resulting in delayed care (worse recovery outcomes and deaths).

[–] Uranhjort@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Given their history of industrious villainy, it's safe to say that the answer to that will be "Yes" as long as they're in business.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 5 points 7 hours ago
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

In German we have a word for it: sozialverträgliches Frühableben

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

That appears to be two words.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Damn! You got me!