this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
249 points (100.0% liked)

News

29494 readers
2945 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
rjc@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
gedaliyah@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
jeffw@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
admiralpatrick@lemmy.world
jordanlund@lemmy.world
249
Supreme Court blocks Oklahoma from launching taxpayer-funded religious charter school - ABC News (abcnews.go.com)
submitted 5 hours ago by miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/news@lemmy.world
32 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/44884488

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 67 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

A very pessimistic thank you.

The fact that this is a debate at all, in the year of our fantasy, fairytale, magic miracle performing lord, 2025, is just sickening to me.

Religion should be studied sociologically, psychologically, and historically for what it actually is, mythology and superstition. It should be studied for how it's been used as a tool for control of the ignorant and poor masses, by the elites to keep power and wealth.

But no. 70-80% or more of people on this planet still actually believe in fairytale bronze age mythology nonsense. Doctors, senators, police, military leadership, judges.

We have split the atom, discovered quantum mechanics, have robots and helicopters on Mars, cured diseases. Yet we are still so archaic and uncivilized. Religion should have died already.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 3 points 1 hour ago

Religion is a cultural lie and even those that are religious know it. They want to bully people into "saying the words with them" because it makes them feel better. They don't care if you believe or not ... they just want you to say the words or at the least have it be illegal to contradict them. Most religious people's egos are so weak that they cannot handle questioning their faith because it shatters their own.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 33 minutes ago (1 children)

I was blown away recently when I found out that 90'ish percent of chinese people are athiests.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 2 points 17 minutes ago

Sorry, not correct. 90% don't associate with "religion", but to them that means religious orgs. 30% of Chinese people believe in Buddha. Only around 30% are actually Atheist

Source: https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2023/08/30/non-religion/

[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

Until you can explain the universe with a formula religion will not die, and even then the formula could be argued to be the rational expression of god. And it is not clear to me that religion is bad. Bad people are bad, (although I entirely dismiss the notion of evil) and they use structures in religions, politics et all to do bad things. But that doesn’t mean that religion itself is bad.

I’m not religious myself, but there’s very clearly a place for religion even in modern civilizations. Also one fundamental aspect of religion that many critics miss because they confuse it with spirituality, is community. More than ever people need a sense of community, and I think that for many people religion can be the thing that gives them that.

And after saying all that, people should have the freedoms to believe whatever the fuck they want honestly.

[–] bss03 3 points 1 hour ago

Bad People will do Bad Things, but religion gets Good People to do Bad Things. because they believe they are good.

Sincere but incorrect belief can do that without anything we might recognize as religion, tho.

Still I think Optimistic Nihilism CAN replace all the things people think they get from religion. And, it doesn't require fervent belief in anything without evidence. (Sometimes the optimism feels tenuous, tho.)

[–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 2 points 2 hours ago

until you can conquer the fear of death and the unknown, religion will persist.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Anime builds communities - some of the largest gatherings in the world are anime conventions, people build shrines to the characters, some even go so far as to claim marriage to the characters most dear to them - and yet anime has never been the justification for genocide, the rationalization for slavery or the claimed source from which all morality is derived. And yet despite all that, I'm 100% certain you'll agree someone holding an unshakable conviction in 'My Hero Academia' as a literal accounting of historical events should be precluded from any position of authority. On the grounds that they're too divorced from reality to make sound decisions.

This is what the religious masses look like to the ~~sane~~ outsiders. You claim many good things that religion provides, but you fail to acknowledge that those things can exist completely independently of a system responsible for more death, suffering and cruelty than any other humanity has developed. At best that's just plain ignorant, at worst it's intentional deception.

[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You seem to think that religion is the cause or the “excuse”. But it isnt. The cause and the justification is that we are animals like any other, flawed and guided by instincts. It is our nature to want more than we have, even when we have enough because the future is always uncertain.

Just like humans don’t need religion to have morality we do not need religion to justify genocide, war and violence. It would have happened through any other justification.

If we take your view to the extreme I could also use it as a justification for genocide, just to illustrate my point. So no, religion is not the problem itself.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

But it isnt.

I hate to get all schoolyard here, but yes it is. I'll happily grant that the root cause behind nearly every suffering is that humans can be convinced to be awful tribalistic little shits to each other at the drop of a hat, but there's no honest way to get away from the reality that religion has been and continues to be the #1 hat to drop when you're looking to appeal to humanity's basic capacity for cruelty. Look, I can easily demonstrate the point - find me an ethnic cleansing where religion wasn't a primary motivation/justification. I'll wait.

And please feel free to take my view to the extreme! But it falls just a little bit flat when you do, since I don't have to take religion to an extreme to find examples of it being used to justify all kinds of horrible things. Do I think that an abstract concept (like a system of belief) is in itself good or evil? No. Nuns don't kill people, people kill people. But I do think it's a tool which has, time and time again, demonstrated that it brings nothing to society which cannot be gained elsewhere, yet introduces an incredibly easily exploited and basely irrational system wherever it gets it's toe in the door. It's an outdated concept that needs to be left in the dust of history, there only to serve as a cautionary tale for those that come after (though I admit that as a species, we're godawful about actually paying attention to those...)

side note(Okay so fair's fair: arguably mitma wasn't religiously motivated. It gets a bit fuzzy as the Inca often used religion as a tool to provoke or promote resettlement, and that's on top of the whole blending of religion and bureaucratic system. It's a fascinating topic, really, and I'd be willing to debate its applicability if you'd like!)

[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You confuse justification for cause. Again my argument that even in a world in which somehow organized religion never developed, the same violence would have happened under a different pretense or even no pretense at all.

“I want what you have and I can take it, so I will” is enough justification in a perfectly rational non religious world for any kind of war and violence.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

In a world where religion never developed, nothing would have changed? Then it rather clearly carries that it's sole use has been to introduce some exploitable divisions in our non-hypothetical universe. I'm sorry, I think you're actually making my case for me at this point.

(I'm not confusing boo, and don't presume to tell me what I mean.)

[–] cattywampas@lemm.ee -4 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

You make a lot of great points here that I try (often to no avail) to explain to people all the time. Namely these two:

  1. Arguing whether there's a creator or the universe began spontaneously doesn't really matter, as the existence of a creator (or architect, or programmer, you could phrase it different ways) only moves the goalposts one spot and the question still remains: why does anything exist rather than nothing?

  2. Religion isn't inherently bad or evil. It's a human construct and is as susceptible to corruption and misuse as any other, from governments to sports organizations to scientific groups to academic institutions to PTA boards and HOAs.

[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 hours ago

Exactly. It’s very easy to see how the judgement of how religion has been utilized for terrible things can itself be a justification to do the exact same terrible things. If that is the case then clearly the thing itself is not the problem, but rather how we use the thing.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

  1. It's holographic.

  2. A reasonable rebuttal might be that all those other things have never been co-opted to instigate, for example, an ethnic cleansing.

[–] cattywampas@lemm.ee 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Governments and the concept of nation-states have never been used to instigate ethnic cleansing? Sports organizations have never been complicit in something as heinous as slave labor?

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Quatari Kafala is directly derived from Shiara. It's even alluded to in the article you linked. I know it's leaning into the stereotype and honestly I'm usually a whole lot less rude than this, but my dude that was a truly terrible example to go with.

(Edit: Sorry to be clear, yes, that's absolutely correct - I'm aware of no ethnic cleansing, government or otherwise, that's been divorced from religion. Nor do I know of any broad slavery schemes that don't use religion as a justification for their actions. I really really want you to check me on this because it'll be damned educational, and to be totally fair I'm not actually certain that there's never been a secular slave trade. Just fairly confident.)

[–] cattywampas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Right. And FIFA, a secular organization headquartered in Switzerland, selected Qatar knowing all this and they were perfectly ok with that sort of exploitation to make the World Cup happen. To say nothing else of their history of bribery and corruption.

Companies with no religious affiliation are no better. They'll produce bombs, sell weapons to terrorists and genocidal governments, whatever brings home the bacon.

PTAs and school boards discriminate against trans and queer kids all the time. HOAs discriminate against minorities all the time.

People in groups have always used their power to enrich themselves, hurt others, and control the world around them. This is a phenomenon that isn't limited to any one organization, sacred or secular.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Not being churlish I'm genuinely a little unclear - what's your thesis here? I don't think it's news that a secular organization can be involved with vile systems, but that appears to be the crux (sorry) of what you're trying to say. I think we may be arguing past one another.

[–] cattywampas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

My point is that religion isn't inherently a negative thing. And not worse than any other human institution solely because of its belief in the supernatural, and that organized religion is just as susceptible to corruption and weaponization as any institution.

To be clear, I'm an atheist.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

So, why are you an atheist?

[–] cattywampas@lemm.ee 1 points 44 minutes ago

Because I'm a skeptic, and I don't see any reason to believe in a creator or higher power. And if I did, a creator/architect is as far as that belief would go, I wouldn't think that being was personally involved in our lives or morals, just someone who pressed play on the program.

And if there was one, I don't think any human-made religion is so wise as to have found all the answers. That's just prideful foolishness.

I'm open to the idea that there may be aspects to our existence and the universe of which we are not entirely aware, though as long as we can't see any evidence of it I don't think there's much need to dwell on it.

On a more personal note, I think the way organized religion is the most damaging is how it makes people satisfied in their ignorance. Both because in their eyes it already explains so much so there's no need to learn more, and also because there is a divine plan so there's no need to question why things are the way they are or how they could be different.

Yeah sure, wars and genocide and slavery and all that. But like I said, people can find any excuse to be horrible and greedy and hurt others. It's not hard to do, doesn't need to be divine. But I think it's a lot harder to convince someone to keep themselves uneducated when humans are naturally curious.

[–] cattywampas@lemm.ee 21 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Rare Supreme Court W. Although I gotta admit I've been pleasantly surprised by this court lately.

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

Not so sure.The article stated, the vote means the issue is not binding nationwide, and may be reconsidered again. I guess someone from a different state could file, as that seemed to be part of the ruling.. INAL, so anyone who has better info, I'd love to hear from you.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago

It's probably better than we could have reasonably hoped for with this court, but a 4/4 split that doesn't create any nationwide precedent to enforce the super unambiguous "shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion" language in the first amendment is still pretty bad. We dodged a bullet but the gun is still loaded.

Because the Supreme Court divided evenly, its decision is not a binding precedent nationwide and sets the stage for the entire court to reconsider the issue in a future case, perhaps from another state.

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

i'm completely ignorant, so take this with a spoon of salt. but, i feel like the SC has found its legs lately. still not perfect, but that was never intended, but it looks like the product of a lot of long, long discussions. it looks like a good thing to me for now

(ed-sp)

[–] cattywampas@lemm.ee 15 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I think they're appearing more sensible lately since this administration is so batshit crazy. It's one of the perks of lifetime terms with a high barrier for removal. They're not beholden to any political party or branch and they're free to rule as they see fit without fear of retribution, even the Trump appointees.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 6 points 4 hours ago

... without fear of retribution, ...

I'm not so sure about that.

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

i totally agree. interesting to see how far that guy has strayed from conservative ideology as shown in the highest court.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 7 points 4 hours ago

No, my government-funded Satanic schools!

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Wow, this court is no longer making sense to me.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 2 points 4 hours ago

"Blocks."