this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
356 points (97.6% liked)

Progressive Politics

3008 readers
247 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Seventy-five House Democrats voted on Monday in support of a resolution that praised President Donald Trump’s deportation regime.

The vote came as Trump deployed more than 1,700 National Guard members and 700 Marines to Los Angeles to crush protests against increased U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids and mass arrests.

Sponsored by Rep. Gabe Evans, R-Colo., a pro-Israel Republican, the bulk of the resolution was dedicated to condemning the attack last month in Boulder, Colorado, against pro-Israel demonstrators calling for the release of hostages in Israel. Tucked into the text was a line praising ICE, expressing “gratitude to law enforcement officers, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement personnel, for protecting the homeland.”

While some Democrats are busy joining Republican colleagues to praise ICE, Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., is seeking to pass a law that holds police accountable for violence against protesters. Her bill, introduced in late May, would apply penalties to law enforcement for using force in response to a demonstration.

top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dadifer@lemmy.world 54 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What the fuck. Fuck the Democratic party.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Manufactured opposition. A core component of the fascist coup.

Liberal Democracy is Dead

[–] UsernameHere@lemy.lol 36 points 1 month ago (3 children)

This is a transparent, well-worn DC play. Put Democrats in a political box by forcing them to choose between voting against an antisemitism resolution so Republicans can slam them as being antisemitic and anti-Israel — or voting for the resolution, so they can hit the Party for being divided and chaotic.

Seems like this article is trying to do the latter.

I wish these tactics didn’t work but this is how the GOP got control of our country.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago (3 children)

These tactics would not work if Democrats were not grovelling for Israel at every opportunity.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

raising money by calling donors is most of a congressman's job. AIPAC rolling up and saying they can skip that hassle must be a pretty compelling offer.

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Also, if they all collectively called it out, call it the "Pro-ICE Bill" or "Pro-kidnapping Bill" or whatever. Make the vote about that. Call the Republican who sponsored the Bill a coward for trying to do it, and a fool for thinking it would work.

"Why did you vote against the Bill condemning attacks on Pro-Israel protesters?"

"I didn't. I voted against a bill that supported the mass deportations and unconstitutional actions made by ICE, which we are absolutely against because we support due process. The bill was a cowardly and foolish attempt to get us to support this despicable practice by pretending it's about something else, but we're not fools or cowards ourselves, so we won't fall for it."

"But the Bill is called..."

"Sycophantsayswhat?"

"What?

"I guess that sort of trick works on you."

[–] UsernameHere@lemy.lol 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

These tactics work with voters. That’s how the GOP got control of our government.

If politicians ignore voters they don’t get elected.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Our politicians are ignoring the voters, at the expense of elections

Their corporate donors are more important to them than their actual constituents they are supposed to represent

[–] UsernameHere@lemy.lol -4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

If politicians could just ignore voters they wouldn’t spend money on campaigns and propaganda.

Voters are getting what they voted for even if it is not in their best interest.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They are ignoring the policy interests of their voters and instead relying on scare tactics to secure votes.

The politicians have no interest to fight for or run on the best interest of the voters, only the best interest of their corporate donors.

Voters are caught in a political system where no party is interested in fighting for the working class, for everyday americans. As the party that is supposed to be the opposition to the fascist party continues to ignore the material harms people are experiencing, and instead moves to their policies to the right, those voters become angry and resentful. The fascist party takes advantage of that by acknowledging those material harms people face, yet utilize scapegoating to capitalize on gaining those votes while furthering their fascist policies.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Democrats had no problem ignoring voters pleading with them to stop supporting genocide.

[–] UsernameHere@lemy.lol -5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The majority of voters didn’t plead for that

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

They did. A vast majority of voters said they wanted a ceasefire.

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If we take this to be true, either

A) The majority of voters wanted a continuation of the genocide, which doesn't make sense unless they're a "silent majority" or:

B) The majority of voters don't care, leaving the Democratic party to pursue its own goals in spite of a vocal minority opposed to genocide.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

If politicians could just ignore voters they wouldn’t spend money on campaigns and propaganda.

If they care about winning.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

The GOP got elected because the Democrats adopted GOP voting and tactics.

You are flipping reality on its head and pretend it is an argument.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

forcing them to choose between voting against an antisemitism resolution so Republicans can slam them as being antisemitic and anti-Israel

The majority of Americans dont support whats going on in Israel. So its not much of a box to be in. https://news.gallup.com/poll/657404/less-half-sympathetic-toward-israelis.aspx

What the dem congressman as a group and individually risk is campaign contributions from AIPAC. This has always been about bribes from foreign lobbyists. They arent trapped in any box they dont want to be in. ITs like saying your cat is trapped in a box. They love that box.

[–] UsernameHere@lemy.lol -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bribes are part of it. But as recent progressive candidates found out, those donations also make or break an election.

The system is broken in a way that favors campaigns with funding.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

yeah. I just wish they cared more about doing whats right and what their constituents want. Except for the abstract threat of re-election, I dont think many of them care what we think. There needs to be a new school house rock series to describe this new reality to us filthy peasants.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 month ago

Dems sprinting right to be gop lite along with citizens united saying money = speech is why we're in this mess

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not even sure what "democrat" means anymore. They havent really had a cohesive platform since Obama. Its just some vague "left of whatever republicans say" sort of hand waving that they often dont even bother to follow through on.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

It means "republican policy but pretending to not love all the cruelty."

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I hate Liberalism, these politicians do absolutely nothing but give legitimately to an authoritarian system.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah but remember this is our fault for not voying for harris

And if we did, it's our fault for not double voting for her.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

centrists don't care who you vote for any more than they care if they lose.

They just want silence from the anti-genocide pro-worker left.

That's not true! They also want us on our knees and bleeding.

And maybe not standing up for queer people.

[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 17 points 1 month ago

the American two party system.

dumb and dumber

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Mad respect to Ilhan Omar for consistently refusing to cower away from what she believes. I can't even imagine the threats she must deal with on a daily basis

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

She is braver than I am, that's for sure. If I got even one of the letters she had in public office I think I'd retire.

[–] Binturong@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

I think you misspellt "the paid opposition" which is really all anyone can justifiably call the Democrats given their recent behaviour and decisions, and there's no sign of learning or changing tactics cause they're paid no to by the same investors that paid the other fucking side. Capital is the enemy here, it has no allegiance but to itself, and it has wrestled the political body away from the voting public, due in no small part to class turncoats in government lobbying in the open. There is no room for partisans if any remnant of America as we know it is to be saved, anyone picking sides has chosen the wrong one already, there's only the side of the people.

[–] bappity@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

what could be worse than having to choose between two evils

[–] sxan@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago

Nothing.

First past the post is objectively the worst voting system. It's worse than dictatorship because, at least in a dictatorship, 100% of the voters get 100% of the outcomes they chose.

As long as we used FPTP we're guaranteed to get a clusterfuck and always the lesser of two evils.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So this is the party who's fighting for our rights? Praising the people invading LA?

Good to know the DNC is on the side of Trump. Again.

[–] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago