this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2025
89 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3023 readers
1060 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
simsymbiote@midwest.social
Type1@midwest.social
89
Nevada Governor Lombardo vetoes bill which would have established maximum nurse-to-patient ratios in hospitals (nurse.org)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to c/usa@midwest.social
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago

This is one of the biggest problems in the medical system and the boomers are about to learn all about it

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 week ago

That's because Republicans are PRO LIFE! Of CEOs and Billionaires!

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This sounds like good news? Putting a cap on the number of nurses isn't the way to reduce understaffing. Or is this a reporter that can't math?

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's gotta be the latter because the former is insane. I suppose a maximum ratio could prevent well funded hospitals from scooping up all the nurses, but that's not something the nurses union would endorse.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Four out of three people struggle with math.

[–] Mohamed@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

The article fucked it up. The bill (first version) says: "Section 8 of this bill establishes the maximum ratios for the number of patients that may be assigned to a direct care nurse at one time in certain hospitals in a county ... ".