this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
48 points (62.0% liked)

Political Memes

8879 readers
2000 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 64 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well yeah, and if more people did that we wouldn’t be dealing with nearly as many problems as we currently are.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And you were told that if you vote for Trump you will never have to vote again.

[–] EffortlessEffluvium@lemm.ee 5 points 3 weeks ago

And what they heard was: “And you’ll never have to think again!”

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

I don't remember anyone promising anything. Just that sabotaging Harris out of spite was objectively bad and that you could bash Dems as much as you want after the election.

Nobody promised a revolution.

[–] Guidy@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Unfortunately too many people decided she didn’t hate Israel enough and sat out the election. And the democrats aren’t changing either way.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 34 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Which entertaining that Harris was as bad as Trump on Israel/Gaza policy (she wasn't), every person who sat out objectively said, "I also don't care about Russia's genocide in Ukraine, Women's bodily autonomy, climate change, vaccination policy, or LGBTQ+ rights."

Suckers fell for the bullshit.

[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago

In a winner-take-all election, anything but a vote for the runner-up is an endorsement of whoever wins.

Yes, this system is stupid. But we're not going to ever fix it by pretending that the rules of the game aren't what they are. Any eligible voter who didn't vote for Trump or Harris make a clear statement that Donald and protect 2025 were just fine by them. Regardless if they stayed home, voted for a vanity campaign, or just left the POTUS choice blank.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 3 weeks ago

If anything, they learned the wrong lessons

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

There's a lot of space between hating Israel and being Israel's lapdog. Kamala didn't use any of it.

They aren't changing because they don't need to. The job is already done, their public was successfully manipulated into blaming anyone but the actual people that are in charge of rhe party and the platform itself. Enabling and scapegoating does not lead to change.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

That wasn't the only issue...

For example, she became pro border wall and pro fracking.

Other stuff too, in virtually every aspect she intentionally set her policy positions to the right of the Dem voting base to court the mythical "moderate Republicans" who stopped calling themselves Republicans decades ago.

Kamala losing was the result of the "who else will the left vote for, if not me".

And like normally happens, the answer was "no one".

We know how it works out because it keeps being the only choice, and Dems keep losing.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Martin just ran out two members of the Rules and Bylaws committee....

Two neoliberal superdelegates who were literally and figuratively the problem with the party.

Ironically enough, the voting members of the DNC wouldn't have had the chance to make this pivot to the left if more people had held their nose for Kamala.

When a Dem becomes president, they pick the DNC chair and a vote is performative. If Kamala had won, the party would have stayed in the hands of neoliberals and they'd keep running sham primaries...

Which brings me full circle to Martin running Saunders and Weingarten out of the party, they were on the committee that sets rules for primaries.

So the Dem party is being fixed, it's just billionaires own the media and they'd rather Republicans win if a progressive makes it to the general. So there's a push to get people disengaged from the party, if that allows a neoliberals to win the primary, the media will suddenly stop talking shit about the Dem party again.

[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 weeks ago

This also applies to Biden. So many leftists held their nose for Biden due to his progressive promises and in order to "usher in" a new generation of progressives afterwards.

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago

Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Imagine being a Democrat....

[–] sad_detective_man@leminal.space 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"oops sowwy. we were only going to reform the party if we win. looks like we gotta stay late-stage capitalists and keep benefiting from fascists existing. dang"

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I dont remember anyone promising to reform the party. The point was to stop infighting until after the election and agree that she was the better option.

[–] sad_detective_man@leminal.space 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

if you run in any of the farther left spaces where she's kind of hated the pro-kamela rhetoric within was "secure democrat victory to protect the country from fascists, then bully democrats into actually representing the values they pretend to champion"

that's the conversation this meme is referring to. not democrats promising to change, leftists saying we can change democrats after we make sure they win their races against fascists