this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2025
797 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

71995 readers
4745 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] j0ester@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Even a town I used to live in with Donald voters, more than half the town couldn’t get speed over 5 Mbps - they had to use Satellite. And the other half? We had over 800 Mbps. 2 years after Covid, the other town finally has it. Ridiculous.

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 78 points 1 week ago (6 children)

To be fair, this federal program was a cluster eff since they started it in about 2010. It passed a bunch of grant money through to the states, which all did different "things" with it. Most held semi-public meetings and planning sessions for 5-10 years or wrote detailed planning documents but never delivered any physical infrastructure (actual results to the residents).

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 66 points 1 week ago

Some states / towns hired ISPs who just pocketed the money with no consequences. Some towns even got fed up with no progress and started their own ISPs only to get sued by said corrupt ISP. Looking at you Verizon FiOS.

[–] forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org 33 points 1 week ago

Still no justification for this money to be funneled to felon musk.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm confused. The article is talking about "BEAD" which wasn't passed until 2021. You must be talking about a different program.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Yea he is, but it's probably the same telecom handout bullshit like the other program.

Trump is a piece of shit, but every program he cuts is not necessarily wrong. Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'm sure that there are examples of actually wasted money, but just putting it out there that planning is fucking important. There have been several high profile projects, like Texas high speed rail, where planning was the hard part and the project got canceled as they were ready to break ground because "there was no progress". Cue* Republicans "the government does nothing" after they stopped anything from happening. Infrastructure cannot operate on election cycle timelines.

Digging in the ground and integrating with existing infrastructure isn't just a plug and play operation. Leases and liens need to be sorted out. Estimates of current and future demand needs to be sorted out so you don't install useless networks. Fiber isn't that heavy, but "can the existing conduits under bridges/roads/etc support it and/or do they have room to without a complete replacement" isn't a trivial question for backbone lines.

Winging it just causes more problems as you find things you didn't anticipate and cause delays while having to continue paying contracts so work can resume once the delay is cleared. If you don't, the contractor is on to their next job and unavailable for an effectively random amount of time. While everyone is mad at you that "no work is being done".

It could be done faster, but it would cost more. Because planning is really important to keep multi-million/billion dollar projects accountable and on track.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Speak for yourself.

My city is rolling out fiber.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago

I'm in Wyoming and fiber started rolling out in multiple cities with multiple different providers in each city two years ago. They got to my house earlier this year so I now have a 2Gb/s connection.

Most of this money was also "allocated" but not really spent. So at least to Bidens credit money wasn't thrown away, it just sat there not doing what it was supposed to do.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 50 points 1 week ago

The funniest part is that it's his voters lol

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Rural voters overwhelmingly voted for this. I have no sympathy. I'm downloading shit fast as fuck. And I'm using my symetric fiber to seed 24/7 the following torrents: CDC data removed from gov websites, data leak from Patriot Front (a local fascist movement in USA), and war crimes committed by IDF in Gaza. Plus a lot of porn.

Cheers, shitbags! You got what you voted for.

[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Frontier trounced all over Xfinity here because of this program. I now have fiber vs 300mbps (400 plan). So many blue dots around WV but the koolaid is in the water.

[–] dukethorion@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Funds allocated throughout the years have NEVER actually gone to providing/increasing broadband in rural areas.

[–] PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Not true, just got 2Gb fiber in rural WI through a federal grant allocated 2 years ago.

[–] oppy1984@lemm.ee 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not entirely, my ISP is a family owned regional cable company and they took the grant and have rolled out fiber across multiple counties.

I get what you're saying about the mega corps, yeah they just pocket a lot of the money. But the smaller ISPs are being smart and investing in their infrastructure to be able to complete.

[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Frontier took the money and said, "Watch us trounce the big boy monopoly here"

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Never say never. There are actually several areas where I've seen fiber build out from government grants.

That said, they are EXCEPTIONALLY rare and typically scumbag ISPs pocket the money with no consequences, since nobody who writes these laws sets up consequences for failing to deliver.

[–] Pantsofmagic@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would think the tech bros running things would want more people to train their models on.

[–] RobotZap10000@feddit.nl 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I would think that Muskrat would like more customers for his satellite internet business.

[–] henfredemars 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is exactly what some of my extended family uses because there’s literally no other option. Not even cellular.

This isn’t even up in the mountains or something. This is just rural Alabama where kids are struggling to do homework because they just don’t have access, and it all but guarantees that their technology skills will remain woefully outdated.

I remember when they had DSL not that long ago and I would turn off updates on everything because it was a complete waste of time to attempt.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

My grandparents lived in rural OK and had dial-up until 2018 when they finally were able to get a 2mbps DSL line. It really wasn’t much faster than the dial-up.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

That is apparently going to have competition soon.

But ... yeah. Operating via satellites is profitable for sparsely populated areas, operating via wire - for densely populated ones. In addition to that Earth's orbit is not under anyone's sovereignty.

Both have their uses, but, I think, in locations in a developed country with old infrastructure because it's not profitable, - this means there won't be any.

The sad part is that if, say, I want to have unabused Internet connectivity from Russia, a Starlink terminal is not my solution, cause Elon still wants to be friends with those obnoxious people. And also if it were a solution, a terminal could be triangulated and my ass would meet a soldering iron. Maybe not, but some fines.

[–] Geodad@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Capitalism perverts all good intentions. It twists them to make a quick buck.

It's a cancer on society.

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I got mine, even though it’s 1 gb down 300 mb up, but it’s still rural fiber.

[–] dil@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Yeah but does Iran have nukes? Checkmate!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 week ago (7 children)

What's an average Internet connection like in the USA? How many megs down?

[–] falynns@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

10gig symmetrical for $50/month on Sonic fiber. Still too expensive but I can't believe the rest of the US pays so much for so little, and worse thinks it's a great deal. Typical US speeds are 30 years behind but Americans are so very, very stupid.

[–] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 days ago

10 gig is amazing!

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I'm getting 270 down and 40 up. Fucking comcast has a monopoly in my area, so I'm paying $120/month for it unless I want to go back to DSL.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

most areas have ISP monolopies, which is somewhat understandable given the high infrastructure costs etc. For that reason they should be regulated as utilities, but aren't because high speed internet isn't legally "essential" in the year of our lord 2025.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] MeaanBeaan@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Heavily depends on where you live. I live near a big city on the east coast in a largely Blue state. I have 1 gig FiOS internet (up and down). In my area Comcast and Verizon compete for customers so our speeds here are alright. But there are plenty of areas in the US that have absolutely abysmal internet. Either because the area is rural so not much infrastructure has been built up or because the ISP in that area holds a monopoly on the market and doesn't have to increase speeds to keep their customers. I've heard horror stories of people being stuck with like sub 10mbps because there are just no other options.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I probably have pretty close to the top of the curve with 1140mbps up/down according to my plan. In actuality though my speed test reads at 864 up and 859 down.

[–] Alaik@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

Highest I've ever gotten was 200 down/10 up. My current is 50 down/10 up.

I pretty much always pay for the highest grade service in the area. Each time I've bought a home, I've researched the ISPs that service it and that also affected what the homes value was to me.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ramsgrl909@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

So very glad I got to benefit from this 3 years ago, it is a true shame if it goes away. I get to be rural and work at a company in the city.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That article has a pretty extreme example: guy on 21 acres atop a steep ridge who doesn’t have phone service or running water or probably any infrastructure. There’s going to be people you can’t reach with fiber and this may be one of them. We can argue about that when the other 99% has fast internet service

[–] ITGuyLevi@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Years ago my neighborhood was wired for fiber, well all except for 24 of our houses because it wasn't profitable, copper still came on our side though... Now that's been turned off so the 24 of us have the option of cable or wireless.

Having to stare at a coil of fiber across the street on the end of the pole (not even buried fiber, its on the damn poles) while I enjoy overpaying for 48Mbps... so fast it must be high speed (seriously debated a wireless link to the house across the street but I'm a stickler for the rules).

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Even in more urban areas …. My ex asked for help getting internet service in her new condo, and I found out the entire town has fiber, except her condo development. They have an exclusive contract with ComCast and she can’t do anything about it

load more comments
view more: next ›