Good reason to vote for someone else.
this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
179 points (95.0% liked)
politics
24429 readers
2126 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The only reason I can think of for Clinton giving Cuomo support is that they must have shared a tween at some point in their past.
He would.
It is on brand
Abusers stand together. We need more solidarity to stop them.
Serial sexual harassers stick together
Another example: Bill Clinton officiated Anthony Weiner's wedding
What about Carlos Danger’s?
It’s insulting how hard the Democrats are pushing a sex pest who killed people during Covid just because his primary opponent is a dem-soc. How can anyone make progress with ‘allies’ like these?
Honestly thought you were talking about Clinton here
Could be. I don't know what Bill was up to during covid
Helping Seth Rogan craft a more obnoxious laugh
What, they couldn't get Liz Cheney's endorsement? These people are so out of touch...
they’re very much in touch. But only With donors.
With donors.
Especially AIPAC.
Phew. I read that as with minors, and thought the narrative shifted to the other side.
I mean, it's an encouraging sign that they think this endorsement is necessary. Zohran must be doing well in internal polling.
A ton of their donors probably live in the city and would be directly affected. Even more of a reason to vote for him
Who even wants a Bill Clinton endorsement? I don’t live in NYC so it’s not something I’m going to have to deal with but who is thinking “Oh, the elderly sex pest endorsed him? That’s going to change my decision.”
All the voting Democrats that still haven't read a history book and still think Clinton was the greatest president of their lifetime, and complete ignorance of how much him and his wife are directly responsible for ALL the deep shit we're in today.
Between this and the times printing 3 anti Zohran articles it seems to me they're trying to blitz low info voters to vote against not only Zohran but all the candidates more progressive then a literal sex pest who caused more senior death during covid than necessary.
the Democrats are pushing a sex pest
Which one of them do you mean? Clinton or Cuomo?
who killed people during Covid
Ah ok, must be Cuomo. ALTHOUGH..do we REALLY know what Bill was up to in the forests of upstate New York in 2020? 🤔
Dem establishment is so afraid and out of touch they think this will move the needle, maybe it will maybe it won’t, for better or for worse, all I know if further alienates me and probably other newyawkers that want to vote dem but absolutely hate every candidate that is propped up by money.
Have you voted yet in the primary (if eligible)?
For anyone reading this who's a registered Democrat and lives in NYC it's super import you vote in the primary by June 24. Urge as many like-minded friends and family to vote and offer them a ride or go on the bus with them if they need help with transportation. Even search things like NYC or New York City on social media and if you think they are like-minded urge them to vote.
Rank these names from #1 (best) to #5 (tolerable): Zohran Mamdani, Brad Lander, Adrienne Adams, Michael Blake, Zellnor Myrie
I'd recommend Zohran #1 and Brad #2. Zohran has a stellar ability to motivate volunteers. You really need those door knockers, they will help tip the scale in the general election. The general election is going to be difficult because Adams is running as an independent. If Cuomo wins, he and Adams will split the vote and hand the election to the Republican Curtis Sliwa. Zohran is fresh and gives voters someone to get excited about. He can crush the spoiler effect.
the Republican Curtis Sliwathe Republican Curtis Sliwa
Sliwa? Really? The racist gang leader?
The kakistocracy never ends.
Dem establishment knows exactly what it's doing, because alienating people like you is exactly their goal.
Democrats pretend to be progressive the way Republicans pretend to be Christian. Just a virtue signal that can be jettisoned the instant it becomes inconvenient to power.
If Dems are trying to act progressive, it's only in relation to Republicans.
I think most Dems try to appeal to actual conservative values. It's non-intrusive, light on protections, nothing that might make the average voter uncomfortable (no reparations, no medicaid for all, no major police reform etc). They're pretty vocal about it. It's just that their opposition is fucking terrorists that hate most of their own country.
The political compass is wrong.
Democrats are centrist, conservative. Republicans are right wing, regressive.
The two sided layout is just no longer applicable, and labelling all right-wing crap as conservative is incorrect.
There is a blatant attitude of regressive notions, and it's about damn time people call it out for what it is.
I mean that's better, but you're still ignoring several other axes
It's never been a single continuum, and it's not a quadrant. Your takeaway isn't wrong, but there's so many more options
I think most Dems try to appeal to actual conservative values. It’s non-intrusive, light on protections, nothing that might make the average voter uncomfortable (no reparations, no medicaid for all, no major police reform etc).
Well, yeah. That's what liberalism is, and always has been.
Shocking. Y'all, Clinton was doing speeches for Kamala's campaign, which let's be fr, couldn't have helped, like at all. The party needs to take him out behind the shed lmao
LOL, fitting.
Why would I care that a sex-pest endorsed a fellow sex-pest?
Dawgs Of A Feather
Quit the virtue signaling. Your choices are either a “sex pest” or Trump’s pet.
It's amazing that you can illustrate not only a lack of reading comprehension but also cannot count.
Can read just fine. The others aren’t worth mentioning because they won’t rank. So once again, sex pest or Trump’s pet? Because if you believe any of the others will make a dent, then you are one of those fucking idiots that cost Harris the election because of your “morals.”
This shit aged so well. It must feel so good to be so wrong.
I’m rather proud to be wrong. There might be hope yet in this fucked up country.
That's fair enough.
Bullshit. Zohran is right there, as are 3 other lesser (but still good) candidates
And it's ranked choice voting.
Trump's pet?
Eric Adam’s is Trumps corrupt pet.