this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
630 points (93.0% liked)

Technology

73035 readers
4041 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Meta sparks privacy fears after unveiling $299 Smart Glasses with hidden cameras: ‘You can now film everyone without them knowing’::These stylish shades may look like a regular pair of Ray-Ban Wayfarers, but they're actually Meta's new Smart Glasses, complete with two tiny cameras and speakers implanted in the arms. The wearable tech was unveiled by Mark Zuckerberg Wednesday at the 2023 Meta Connect conference in Menlo Park, California, sparking a frenzy online.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] But_Class_War@midwest.social 91 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"They trust me — dumb fucks," says Zuckerberg

Always good to keep in mind

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 years ago

Alt headline: Dude with boundary issues makes least surprising glasses ever

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 85 points 2 years ago (6 children)

A quick search on Amazon for "spy camera" finds a bunch of devices small enough to easily conceal inside clothing, built in to pens, and built in to watches. A search for "spy camera glasses" finds exactly that, and most of them are well under $300. We're already well into the era of being able to film everyone without them knowing.

[–] thehatfox@lemmy.world 51 points 2 years ago

They aren’t directly connected to a social network and promoted with vast marketing resources however.

I remember playing with one of these about 10 years ago that looked like a car key fob, it recorded somewhat subpar footage in a weird format to a microSD card. A neat novelty but not very practical to use unless you really had a need to do covert surveillance of something, which most people don’t.

However if it’s made to be effortless to push watchable footage to social media, and people are heavily encouraged and incentivised to do so and it’s a different proposition.

[–] pazukaza@lemmy.ml 22 points 2 years ago

I think it is just a matter of convenience. Very few people buy lasers to aim them at airplanes. Give everyone a laser and you'll get a thousand reports of people aiming lasers at their plane.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 10 points 2 years ago

Those at least don't automatically sync to Zuck.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 71 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (9 children)

Hidden cameras? They've got big ol fuckin cameras on them and apparently a red LED that lights up when in use lol. It'd be easier to secretly film someone by pretending you're texting on your phone. More ragebait.

[–] Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago (8 children)

You seriously think it wouldn't be trivial to disable the LED?

And by the time you notice the LED you've already been filmed.

[–] jackalope@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 years ago

It would be trivial to just buy spy cameras already built for spying. The tech already exists

[–] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Buddy, have you been on Aliexpress recently? It's trivial to wire tiny cameras all over your body if you really wanted.

Not that it matters, I can point an 8K cinema camera at you in public, and you don't legally get a say.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 55 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I miss when CCTV was a world ending privacy concern. Its gotten so much worse in the last decade.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 44 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Incredibly funny to see the NY Post pretend that these glasses were just now "unveiled". This line of camera-equipped glasses has been around for 2 years now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JCreazy@midwest.social 40 points 2 years ago (4 children)

You're being filmed everywhere you go and you probably don't even know it.

[–] ZzyzxRoad@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago

Doesn't make it ok.

[–] BROMETHIUS@startrek.website 12 points 2 years ago

Not right in your face at the bar while drunkenly discussing your most regretful one night stands tho.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tygr@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Not a thing was learned from Google Glass huh? Alrighty then.

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 43 points 2 years ago (6 children)

I almost like the idea of augmented reality with similar tech. I'd love it if I could look down the street and see historic photos of building overlaid perfectly.

The issue isn't the technology, it's the people who are supplying it and it's connection to the Internet and sharing. I don't trust Google and I don't trust Meta.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SMT42@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Damage@slrpnk.net 12 points 2 years ago

We were rightly worried about Google glass, we had no idea there was something even worse on the horizon

[–] weew@lemmy.ca 32 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Just saying, hidden cameras have been a thing long before the internet was invented

[–] rDrDr@lemmy.world 61 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Bad people doing bad things is nothing new.

But these things allow good, otherwise well-intentioned, people, to become unwitting moles for Meta.

[–] stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

This is an excellent point +1

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I can't imagine being friends or even acquaintances with a person who would want to live stream their POV as a day to day activity.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dangblingus@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago

NYPost is right wing trash.

[–] EstT@lemmy.ml 22 points 2 years ago (4 children)

‘You can now film everyone without them knowing’ Implying that we dont already have cameras always with us, and can perfectly do that.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] marx2k@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

NYPost.

come on now

[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 18 points 2 years ago

My cyberpunk future of me using a full head mask every time I'm out in public is getting closer.

[–] Kodemystic@lemmy.kodemystic.dev 16 points 2 years ago

Black mirror vibes

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Downvote all news corpse articles

[–] shasta@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So will they just not work in 2 party consent states?

[–] Patquip@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

Clearly the smart glasses wearer will just wear a shirt that outlines their TOS and that by interacting with them, you agree to be recorded.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (3 children)

So this is just an ad, huh.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CCMan1701A@startrek.website 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

My home cameras had some update that required the LED to be on to indicate it was capturing video. This should be required on these products.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Doesn't it have a 'recording' LED?

Remember the good ol' times when some guy stepped up in the cinema, stood in front of the audience, right when the movie was about to start:

"OK, Google!"

:-)

[–] WuTang@lemmy.ninja 10 points 2 years ago

Now you might have an idea how a company making $0 is getting funded.

[–] alienanimals@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (7 children)

People who don't understand that they already lost their privacy years ago: "GASP, this means someone could be recording me!"

[–] Quik 15 points 2 years ago

Which doesn’t make this any better of a future to live in.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They must have a different approach if Google glasses tried the same thing and failed miserably.

[–] Indie59@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Partnering with Luxotica/RayBan to make it look more like normal frames will keep it from being as obvious for one.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] danielfgom@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This might actually be useful for when the cops pull you over. Or if you get bad service in a shop you'll have a video of it.

[–] kicksystem@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

This is exactly the kind of fear mongering that they are hoping people will buy into.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›