this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
330 points (98.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

42102 readers
938 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 50 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Yes. We are heading towards a crash. We are very much already in one, and have absolutley no way out.

Trump killed all US international commerce with his TACO tariffs and is currently propping up a failing stock market by converting medicaid dollars into ICE / TECH BRO MILITARY funding. The stock market keeps doing great because our tax dollars are propping up companies like Google, Plantir, and Amazon through government grants instead of providing us a safety net. That money will run out eventually, but likely not before more CEOs are killed over it.

Literally we are living through the gilded 1920's again but with an American Hitler.

We now have years of uncontrolled inflation well above target rates, a corrupt government, wealth inequality worse than the French revolution, and rampant unintelligent Tariffs hurting all international trade at the cost of every small business in America. These are the same factors that caused the great depression, and if you think it's not going to happen again, you are wrong.

We are a country being lead into disaster by the least competent people imaginable.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ileftreddit@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Republicans are really determined to make life as awful as possible, and the democrats in power are fine with it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works 11 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You just need a union job. I just started mine and my first day I find out we're getting a new contract with $1/hr raises yearly for the next five years, a new boot benefit of $250 a year, better per diem on travel, and better compensation while traveling.

[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

I wonder if IT workers have unions

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ilya12@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The crab said: You just haven't seen your steamer yet. The crab is a low-level animal, and its nervous system is so simple that when it is slowly steamed in the steamer, it will keep stuffing the ginger slices next to it into its mouth. It just feels uncomfortable, and it thinks that eating something will make it better. I don't know if you can understand the meaning of this paragraph. To sum up, we are already in the steamer. We thought that if we find a good job and work hard, everything will be fine, but the fact is that wages are not rising, prices are rising rapidly, and the world is rotten.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 224 points 1 day ago (14 children)

We're already there. The only reason we aren't calling this a depression is that the stock market hasn't been affected much.

But when 25% of Americans are functionally unemployed, it's hard to argue we aren't already largely 'crashed'.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

If the economy doesn't need 25% of the populace to keep functioning...what happens?

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 96 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

The biggest issue is the need for families to have two incomes to support a houshold. Unemployment would plummet if single incomes for the working class were feasible again,since unemployment is based on looking for employment.

Basically if jobs had living wages and we had universal healthcare we wouldn't be in this mess.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 71 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That ship sailed under Reagan, and it's never getting back to port, sadly. Thanks to him, families now needed two incomes.

Then, Bush and Clinton came along, and you needed not only two incomes, but two college degrees. Now, with Dubya, Obama, and Trump, not even that's enough, and they're capping student loans instead of regulating student loan interest, so your only real shot at being a doctor now is being born in the right zip code.

America, baby. Dig it.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (12 children)

it's never getting back to port

In the event of an actual crash, a lot of these "nevers" will get re-evaluated. The New Deal consisted of a lot of "nevers" that all got passed because people didn't want a repeat of the first Great Depression; I'd expect a similar snap-back after the second Gilded Age finally burns itself out.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I mean that's hopeful, but remember that the New Deal also came against the backdrop of the height of socialism in the West and the labor rights movement. Modern Americans don't have the organizational strength to make such a compromise attractive in the eye of the ruling class, and they don't seem intent on ever having it.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Historically, humans don't just suffer in silence for more than a couple of generations.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Well, it's either that or American Revolution II: Electric Boogaloo, so I hope so too.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago

This is part of my problem. My wife has medical issues and can't work which is exaserbated by our higher than typical medical costs. It sucked before but we managed and now it seems like the end.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, I don’t know if OP is in the USA, but having someone like Donald Trump elected to high office is 100% part of a crash already in progress. Inequality got so bad that democracy is not functioning. In a healthy society, Trump would be an unelectable laughing stock.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah. I consider Trump the "blow everything up" candidate, he got a lot of support from people who were just so generically desperate that they wanted to vote for whoever seemed like they were going to majorly change something, somehow. It almost didn't matter what Trump did as long as he smashed the existing order while doing it.

[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Agreed. People were angry - many with good cause. Unfortunately, people often make bad decisions when they are angry.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also, not so fun fact, but this got me curious so I looked up the unemployment rate during The Great Depression: apparently then it was around 20% to 25% as well, so I feel like that reinforces the point I'm making a bit.

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

apparently then it was around 20% to 25% as well

No, the unemployment rate was around 20-25% under the traditional definition. It's currently 4.2% under that definition.

If you want to use this LISEP definition, fine, but recognize that it's been above 30% for most of its existence, and has only been under 25% since COVID. Basically, if you go by the LISEP definition then you're saying that the job market after COVID has been better than it has ever been before.

[–] sartalon@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

And the stock market is just another way for the top percent to continue to siphon wealth.

[–] hobovision@mander.xyz 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

From your own source on "true" unemployment, it's the lowest it has been since they started calculating it. It peaked in 09 at 35% and again in COVID, but all through the early 00s it was between 28% and 30%.

You can't use that number as evidence we "already crashed", because as we've seen in other actual crashes it spikes up to 35%.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When the definition of unemployed is changed to exclude the majority of working age people without jobs then it is no longer a helpful statistic.

That's why we see people calculating real unemployment with other variables.

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (7 children)

When the definition of unemployed is changed to exclude the majority of working age people without jobs then it is no longer a helpful statistic.

U-3 has used the same definition of unemployed since 1940.

Whatever metric you want to use, you should look at that number and how it changes over time, to get a sense of trend lines. LISEP says the "true" unemployment rate is currently 24.3% in May 2025, which is basically the lowest it's ever been.

Since the metric was created in 1994, the first time that it dipped below 25% was briefly in the late 2010's, right before COVID, and then has been under 25% since September 2021.

Under this alternative metric of unemployment, the unemployment rate is currently one of the lowest in history.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Im at 42 weeks. My life plane is heading straight down and the rudder is not responding.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] htrayl@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Meh, please don't quote unusual statistics without giving any context for how to interpet them.

For this value, it is calculated by:

Using data compiled by the federal government’s Bureau of Labor Statistics, the True Rate of Unemployment tracks the percentage of the U.S. labor force that does not have a full-time job (35+ hours a week) but wants one, has no job, or does not earn a living wage, conservatively pegged at $25,000 annually before taxes.

24.3% is not that out of the ordinary - you can see historical data back to like, 1995 here.

Not saying this stat is useless, but the way you've chosen to use it is intentionally and inaccurately inflammatory.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

The fact that it's pegged to 25k means that the number is much much higher. It's not 24.3%. its 24.3% plus everyone who can't afford to live at today's prices.

That's terrifying.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I dunno, H.

I may be wrong in saying it's indicative of a crash, and I'm okay with being corrected.

As to inaccurate or inflammatory, maybe it feels that way if you're on the winning side of the equation.

I think we should be inflamed about this. I don't think it's unreasonable to say that thirty years of high functional unemployment being ordinary is an objectively bad thing, but when you couple it with the increasingly supercharged price gouging and inflation the US has experienced over the last several decades, things that seemed improbable before suddenly become feasible. (Like making fascists electable.)

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago

ye best start believin in economic depression, yer in one!

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 9 points 21 hours ago

In decades past, employees would get both a cost of living raise and performance raise, but the cost of living raise has all but gone away. One way to fix this is to tie the minimum wage to inflation. It'll have tje side benefit of making companies try to reduce inflation rather profiteering.

[–] Kayel@aussie.zone 9 points 22 hours ago

Neoliberalism is reaching its natural conclusion, coupled with the gradual fall of colonialism, is going to lead to a permanent crash for the working class.

While Trump is being loud, the project to divide the US working class by ethnicity has been ongoing always, and began ramping up this century.

It will be required as all production is centralised within a handful of families. And the global south can no longer be relied on for cheap resources and manufacturing for middle class treats.

The US doesn't have a union presence, nor does it have understanding of left politics. Conditions will get worse and worse every decade.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (16 children)

Yes, it's gonna get bad. Jobs in both the private sector, and public sector, universities, etc, we are all feeling the heat right now.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Demonmariner@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

Why, this is a crash, nor are we out of it.

[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s already been going on for 30+ years so whatever you call this is pretty much it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] missingno@fedia.io 9 points 1 day ago

Define what you mean by 'crash'. What's been happening will continue to happen, but if you're expecting any kind of singular dramatic moment, what would that be?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›