this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
1975 points (96.8% liked)

Lefty Memes

5495 readers
19 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


0.5 [Provisional Rule] Use alt text or image descriptions to allow greater accessibility


We require alternative text (from now referred to as "alt text") to be added to all posts/comments containing media, such as images, animated GIFs, videos, audio files, and custom emojis.
EDIT: For files you share in the comments, a simple summary should be enough if they’re too complex.

We are committed to social equity and to reducing barriers of entry, including (digital) communication and culture. It takes each of us only a few moments to make a whole world of content (more) accessible to a bunch of folks.

When alt text is absent, a reminder will be issued. If you don't add the missing alt text within 48 hours, the post will be removed. No hard feelings.


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 240 points 2 years ago (39 children)

I mean you could even take the bottom number and leave them with the top number and they could still live in unimaginable luxury forever. Or just take the lot because fuck em lol.

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 91 points 2 years ago (147 children)

I couldn't imagine spending $1 billion in my entire life, let alone 3-4.

[–] ElHexo@hexbear.net 37 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The difference between someone with $1000 and a million dollars is the same between a millionaire and billionaire.

[–] Bobson_Dugnutt@hexbear.net 44 points 2 years ago

A million seconds is about 12 days. A billion seconds is about 32 years.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (146 replies)
[–] painfulasterisk@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago

If they are self-made millionaires/billionaires as they claim, take everything they have/own and tell them to start the quest again, no glitches, DLC, or saved progress.

load more comments (37 replies)
[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 120 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Tax billionaires until there are no more billionaires

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.world 77 points 2 years ago (102 children)

It's really insane that we legally treat the tenth billion dollars at the same level as a working persons house or car.

Everything is legally just "property".

No, fuck that.

The law should protect the first million of every citizen with ferver. (and when we tackle wealth inequality, most people will have this level of wealth at the end of their working life. The fact that most currently don't is due to inequality. )

Up until 100 million, it should be taxed at a reasonable level. Because at some level, it's fair that people prefer watching Taylor Swift instead of me sing on a stage.

Above that it should be taxed heavily.

And above a billion, it should be just confiscated. As in, oopsie, our system malfunctioned, you weren't supposed to end up with more wealth than what a thousand normal people would save up after a whole lifetime of work, so we are taking it back.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 26 points 2 years ago

you weren't supposed to end up with more wealth than what a thousand normal people would save up after a while lifetime of work

I actively try to cheat at every single-player game that I play. I still don't think I've accumulated a billion anything other than self-criticisms. Even that's questionable.

load more comments (101 replies)
[–] gosling@lemmy.world 81 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Do billionaires actually have billions in real money sitting around? I've always thought the billions were in stocks and couldn't be taxed until they cashed it out and they could technically lose everything if the stock price falls. That's really fucked up if true

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Nobody keeps that amount of cash. Even below a million, most people have most of their wealth in either real estate (their own house) or financial securities (stocks, ETFs, bonds).

Yet, we all gotta pay property tax and capital gains.

The billionaires just have loopholes that they use to never realize gains with loan schemes and trust funds.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 70 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Sad day when "billionaires should pay taxes" is considered a far left position.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] marx_mentat@hexbear.net 48 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Take the inverse of that and you're getting closer to what actually needs to happen.

[–] SoyViking@hexbear.net 41 points 2 years ago

Well-behaved oligarchs gets the Pu Yi treatment, the rest gets the Romanov treatment.

[–] Stumblinbear@pawb.social 40 points 2 years ago (12 children)

Wealth taxes are stupid. That said, nobody needs multiple hundreds of billions of dollars.

The solution is to have regulations and laws in place that prevent them getting this large in the first place. The fact that Amazon and Google own 90% of the internet is absolutely fucked.

[–] drislands@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I agree, no one should be able to hold such an obscene amount of wealth. Right now they do, though. How do you propose this be remedied?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] IzzyData@lemmy.ml 36 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Billionaires shouldn't exist. Their fair share is more like 95%.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] const_void@lemmy.ml 34 points 2 years ago (6 children)

The tax should be even higher. No one needs $100 billion.

[–] Balefirex@hexbear.net 34 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Lurker123@hexbear.net 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)

God the insanity of that wealth is hard to fathom.

Nobody needs $100m, which is itself a totally insignificant amount compared to $1b… and we’re talking people with hundreds of billions :/

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Blapoo@lemmy.ml 32 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'd be willing to be taxed into oblivion if I knew it'd mean everyone else could lead full lives. And I make nothing.

Now imagine the good their excess wealth could do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PatFussy@lemm.ee 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Uhhh is the ask to liquidate their assets? They will just sell a Picaso painting that they 'value' at 60% of their gross income.

Why do you guys fetishize these billionaires and not the giant hedge fund pools that make these guys rich in the first place?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nostradiel@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah and maybe also cutting down on their non-profit organisations scheme to avoid taxes would be nice..

[–] hark@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Wealth taxes actually work, that's why the rich attack them so vehemently.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] usernamesaredifficul@hexbear.net 24 points 2 years ago

well their fair share would be they get nothing (or close to compared to what they do have)

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

10% off the top

By body weight

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WIIHAPPYFEW@hexbear.net 24 points 2 years ago

Chump change lmfao, Eisenhower was taxing 90% of J. Paul Getty’s yearly earnings

[–] 2Password2Remember@hexbear.net 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)

their fair share is connected to their necks, but im sure we can figure out a way to get it off them

Death to America

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] radiofreeval@hexbear.net 22 points 2 years ago

I propose the following tax: one head per billionaire.

load more comments
view more: next ›