this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
243 points (97.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

12666 readers
1474 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Today is a big day for the future of e-bikes in New York City. A hearing starts at 10 a.m. You can file a written comment until 5 p.m. You can also send an email to rules@dot.nyc.gov until 5 p.m

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SpaceScotsman@startrek.website 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Good idea - if you also cap car speeds at 15mph

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 6 days ago

The state of traffic already does that...

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This makes no sense. A cyclist with a decent road bike can easily go faster than that.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I can go faster than that on the clapped out bike I bought when I was still in school. And I'm 45.

In the UK e-Bikes are limited to 15mph (in that the motor cuts out above that, so you can pedal faster if you want), and frankly that's fast enough. Plenty of idiots can't handle even that, and of course they don't use helmets either because fuck having your brain inside your skull, right?

It also depends on your definition of e-Bike, because I've also seen it applied to what are basically motorbikes with an electric engine. I think that sort of thing should require a license and test to be allowed to ride in public.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

When I was younger and in better shape my average speed was 35-40kmh (about 20-25mph).

15mph seems frustratingly and uncomfortably slow. But then again, I’m not terribly familiar with e-bikes. I know that some only help you pedal and others are basically motorcycles, so lumping them all together doesn’t make sense.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 6 points 6 days ago

Just for reference cause I was curious.

The average car speed in New York City varies greatly by location, but is generally quite slow. In Midtown Manhattan, the average speed has been recorded as low as 4.8 mph, which is slower than a brisk walk

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Just build more and bigger sidewalks. In shenzhen and beijing, they often have 2 separated bike/moped lanes on either side of the road, a bike/scooter parking lane, and then like 20 feet of sidewalk you can also ride your electric moped on.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 6 days ago

Take one or two of the traffic lanes to cover it. They have enough.

[–] drphungky@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

15 mph speed limit on roads? That is genuinely the dumbest thing I have read in forever. 15 on mixed use paths is still a kind of low limit, but why on earth should ebikes have a different speed limit on shared roads? Am I supposed to brake down every slight incline next time I visit NYC?

Classic legislating the out group from the in group. The idea that the justification in the text is that "ebikes are heavier than normal bikes [so less dangerous]" while at the same time having a higher speed limit for 2 ton pedestrian killers is insane.

[–] Alloi@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

because they want people purchasing or renting vehicles, and paying for public transportation.

ebikes and regular bikes undercut city profits and private industries invested in new yorks current infrastructure.

making it difficult, pointless, or seemingly "unsafe and scary" is just another way for them to squeeze the already dry working man for a few more drops.

they want continuous subscribers, not "freeloadin communist lbrl sissies"

[–] drphungky@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I don't think there's some nefarious "they" cabal here, certainly not an organized one trying to discourage biking. Occam's Razor is there are a few different types of people supporting this. Chief among them are just carbrained people who can't fathom biking for transportation, who don't realize how slow that is when they've only toodled on a 35 pound mountainbike recreationally at 10 mph. Then you've also got people who have almost been hit by a delivery scooter thinking "ebikes are a menace" solely because they're new and something some "other" group of people uses, and so it's easy to say "they must be stopped" while ignoring the crazy fast, way heavier cars they're already desensitized to.

[–] Alloi@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Then you've also got people who have almost been hit by a delivery scooter thinking "ebikes are a menace" solely because they're new and something some "other" group of people uses, and so it's easy to say "they must be stopped" while ignoring the crazy fast, way heavier cars they're already desensitized to.

i wonder who invested in the consistent motor vehicle marketing and infrastructure over the last 100 years?

surely not the rich and powerful behind the status quo of american car manufacturing.

that would be insane to think they were somehow involved in maintaining the status quo through bribery and lobbying in one of the most populated and popular cities on earth.

unheard of in the united states! surely new yorks very uncorrupt mayor is above such lowely criminal behaviours.

it would make zero sense for someone to make such a silly law for an ecofriendly and virtually free alternative (after a small initial investment in comparison) that existed well before motor vehicles ever did.

occams razor applies, for sure. this is america afterall.

you're probably right, theres nothing to see here. surely the mayor of new york city couldnt possibly be in a position to profit from such a law. that would be INSANE

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 68 points 1 week ago (8 children)

16mph is the limitation in germany. If your bike is faster, you have to register it an pay tax, and cant use dedicated bicycle infratructure anymore.

16mph is exactly the speed where I'm fast enough but dont feel like I would die in a crash.

Everything above would require protective clothing like on motorcycles Imo, and that kind of defeats the purpose for ebikes for me. I want to ride my bike but don't want to have to fight against wind and going up the hill.

If an ebike is as fast as a motorcycle, it should get treated as one.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 1 week ago (20 children)

Yeah this proposal is reasonable. I wouldnt want to share my bikepath with old people driving more than 25kmh. They just dont have the reaction time to safely drive at speeds like that and even that is actually waaay to fast for the oldest. If you wanna go faster, use your muscles and/or drive on the road.

[–] drphungky@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

This proposal is for the road, which is why it's crazy. 25kmh limit on a bike path is fine. A speed limit on roads that is lower for bikes than cars is insane, when the justification for pedal bikes having a higher speed limit is that they're lighter than ebikes. Cars should have a 5 mph limit in that case.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (17 children)

This feels like it's purposefully designed to kneecap the adoption of e-bikes by rendering all class 1 and 2 e-bikes illegal and making it harder/more expensive to buy new ones because they have to have bespoke detuning for the NYC market.

[–] drphungky@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Did you read the bill? This is a road speed limit, not a mandated governor for the motor. It's still super dumb, but it shouldn't do anything to class 1, 2, or 3 sales.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Hmm... Well, I guess that's not as bad, but it's still a little inconvenient since it would require Class 1 and 2 ebike riders to more carefully monitor their speed instead of just riding all the way up to the assisted top speed knowing that they're still in compliance.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] TaTTe@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Why not just add speed limits to areas where higher speeds are an issue? That's been the approach to cars -- no car is limited to 140 kmh despite speeds above that are illegal pretty much everywhere...

Regular bikes can easily go above 15 mph as well, so why should this only affect e-bikes?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί