this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
138 points (96.6% liked)

politics

24832 readers
1734 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/24822895

Archvied copies of the article:

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alexc@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Journalists aren’t to blame… There’s plenty that have written about climate threats because there’s been a lot of Science saying it is for years. It’s the Editors and Media owner that censor those stories that are (partly) to blame.

Extrapolating from there, who influences the Media Owners/Editors? Whomever gives them money - Most likely it’s advertisers, but it’s also rich assholes who buy up Media outlets to control them.

Beyond that, we can also point the finger at Government - They permit these changes of ownership and often exert their own influence.

And, if you want to go full circle, we the population choose what the watch and read, and what we believe.

In short, it’s a societal problem because at the end of the day, we’ve chosen a world where Money is key measurement of how society is doing.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Yes, trace it back and the problem is selfish billionaires, as ever. Journalists operate within a media culture that does not prioritize the actual threats to humanity because to do so would inconvenience a few very rich people.

[–] alexc@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

By inconvenience, I assume you mean the magnitude of their bank account and/or stock portfolio…

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Consider the words of my MAGA father:

  1. He's not concerned because he won't live long enough to see everything turn to shit (jokes on him, it's already happening).

  2. When asked about his children and grandchildren who will have to live through it: "Do you believe in God? If you believe in God, nothing matters because you'll go to heaven when you die."

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

If you believe in God, nothing matters because you’ll go to heaven when you die.

That's a very not-smart interpretation of Christianity. (I assume Christian because old MAGA man; sorry if I'm wrong.) Have you tried asking him why Jesus ever bothered to do anything instead of just staying in bed, or why he didn't just tell his followers to sit on their butts and wait?

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There's no question that he thinks he's Christian. I did not go deeper into it in this conversation, since his "fuck you, I got mine" attitude was specifically directed at me and my children. I was a bit too angry to respond rationally.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

It's quite striking how few xtians follow "the" bible. They are instructed to give up all they have and follow Jesus. When I see some xtian that has "got theirs", I know they either have not read "the" bible, or they are doing a highly selective reading of it.

[–] trslim@pawb.social 3 points 2 days ago

A video from Matt Walsh popped up on my YouTube for some reason, saying that climate change is a leftist hoax. It made me reasonably angry and I hope he gets heatstroke from a climate change induced heatwave.

[–] lukaro@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago

Sure journalist share some blame but it's the republicans that are really to blame. Fucking coal rollers should be publicly and brutally executed!

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not in the least bit concerned.

I knew we didn't have a shot in the dark in 2007. You can't be disappointed in something that hopeless.

Humans react after the fact. Leaded gas and Asbestos were warned against too. Shame.

[–] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Until it harms us directly without doubt of its origin - nothing will be done. The climate is highly correlational so it needs to get really bad until we really start to move.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 1 points 2 days ago

Honestly my region has avaregad .5 C below adjusted historicall averages recently. All of the big storms miss us too. I realize that's unusual globally, but it's very difficult to convince the millions of people who live here that we're in a climate emergency.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 days ago

Am I concerned? Yes. Enough so that I am doing what I can help. From driving less, recycling, voting for those who actually care, get others to do the same, etc. Am I afraid? No, I'm not living in fear because I know shit is a mess. That is not a healthy state to perpetually be in. I do what I can.

[–] griff@lemmings.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Anthony Leiserowitz, the executive director of the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, said Yale’s latest survey found that only 29 percent of Americans are “very worried” about climate change—a remarkably low number, considering that climate change is already killing people and devastating communities around the world and threatens much worse if left unchecked. “I constantly make the point that only 29 percent are very worried, when it should be 100 percent,” Leiserowitz told Covering Climate Now. “This reflects [climate change’s] lack of salience for most Americans. There are many who are not deniers, but do not adequately understand the risks, that the impacts are here and now, and the urgency of action.” These numbers also shed light on The 89 Percent Project that CCNow and dozens of news outlets have been reporting this year. The project is grounded in a cluster of scientific studies finding that 80 to 89 percent of the world’s people want governments to “do more” about climate change.

[–] lukaro@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

Talk to any rando in my community and they'd call you a fool for being concerned.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I almost hope climate change kills us, maybe the rich will suffer too

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

The ultrawealthy are laying plans to hide out in various places - for example, New Zealand. Although I think it's a stretch, people like Musk are eyeing Mars or elsewhere.

While I'm all for things like extropianism, I'm not sure I want the vision that Musk, Thiel, or Curtis Yarvin have for our future...these people have very weird ideas about the future of humanity and seemingly have a very particular view about hierarchies.

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago

The less fortunate will suffer earlier, and worse. Soooooo….

[–] womjunru@lemmy.cafe -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Lmfao. Americans? The whole world. Ffs, not everything is “americas” fault.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This article is about a poll of Americans. It's not required to do a poll of everyone else in the world first, and it doesn't imply anything about people elsewhere. At no point does it say that everything is America's fault. It's just stating the poll's findings about Americans.