Sacrificial lenses ftw
this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
145 points (98.7% liked)
wildlife photography
2132 readers
12 users here now
Welcome to our Wildlife Photography Community!
c/WildlifePhotography is community dedicated to all wildlife photographers and enthusiasts who have an unwavering appreciation for the mesmerizing art of capturing nature's wonders. Whether you're a seasoned pro or just starting your photography journey, this community offers a supportive and inspiring space to connect, learn, and share your work.
Feel free to showcase your breathtaking wildlife photographs and share the stories behind them. From stunning landscapes to up-close encounters, every image has the power to captivate and ignite conversations. Inspire others with your unique perspective, receive valuable feedback, and engage in meaningful discussions about the beauty and significance of wildlife.
We encourage you to credit the original creator when sharing photos that aren't your own. Respecting the work of others fosters a culture of integrity and appreciation within our community, ensuring that every artist receives the recognition they deserve.
If you're seeking help identifying a particular species, please include your location along with the photo.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
This is the real reason for using filters, lmao
I used to use entirely clear filters (UV blocking, perhaps) purely for protection. After seeing various debates I swapped over to religiously using a lens hood, regardless of whether there was glare making the hood needed for its actual purpose. I think the argument was that hoods protect against a wider range of impacts, and in particular provide some cushioning, while filters obviously have an optical impact even if "clear". Third party hoods are also cheap.
That said, hoods are bulky, so filters as protection have their place.
I work in a photo store, and filters save like 90% of fallen cameras
That was the first thing, skylight or pol filter, that I bought the time I used full cameras with different lenses.
I always wonder if the front element would have got damaged in the same way the filter did. Its likely a lot thicker glass.
Not that I'm advocating risking it.
From experience with older lenses....
Probably not damaged the same way, but it can cause other issues without a straight up crack.
That said, an old lens adapted to a modern body can make for some great and fun shots, highly recommended!
Isn’t that technically the second reason for making a polarized filter the default on the lens?
I had this happen once, years ago, on a plane.