this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2025
477 points (94.4% liked)

Technology

73035 readers
3211 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

4 million times faster to watch porns? Their porn industry is thriving

[–] chefdano3@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 hours ago

Still can't use debit cards though.

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 59 points 1 day ago (3 children)

And yet, developers still build sites that load 500kb of JS just to display 5kb of text.

We don’t need faster speeds, we need more reasonable and thoughtful site design. Most sites are ridiculously overengineered, and don’t need a lot of what has been stuffed into them.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

They are more under engineered because of cost cutting and over designed by management because of ignorance and hubris. Developer: “oh yeah this feature will take me a week to implement another week to make it performant and another week to pass QA” Manager: “Oh hell no just slap on this library into the project that I saw getting recommended on LonkedOn”

Here is a lightning fast website that gets the proper amount of engineering time because the goals of management and that of the development team align perfectly.

https://www.mcmaster.com/

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 14 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

You know we use the internet to transfer way more than most websites right?

[–] sqgl@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago

Yes however bloated websites slow traffic for everyone.

[–] JargonWagon@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But then how will you be able to mine every single possible data point on every single visitor so that you can maximize profits with advertisors?! Huh?! /s

[–] Mhad1@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago

Nah its not even always about profit, sometimes its just pure sloppy showoff like a page where I am supposed to sign up should not be promoting the company, if Ive already got onto that page why do I need to scroll all the way down to the join/sign up button!

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

IME it is more devs and managers going wild on the “golly gee wiz” features that are meant to dazzle site visitors, rather than on actual content (or to obscure a lack of actual material content).

Sure, what you mentioned is a problem, and a serious one at that. But your issue arises more from marketers and bean counters and C-Suite execs than devs and managers.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 104 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

over 1,120 miles (1,802 kilometers).

This is the most American thing ever. Taking an official number (1,808km), converting it to customary units (1,123mi) rounding it (1,120mi) then converting it back again with rounding error.

[–] Hoimo@ani.social 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I also have to laugh when someone takes a very rough estimate (around a hundred miles) and converts it to metric with 4 significant figures (160.9 km). Even 160 is too precise when talking about a distance of 80-120 miles. If the original number has 1 sigfig, the conversion should too, even if that feels way off.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

I swear I've bought stuff at Costco before that was 1.3608kg.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)
[–] ksigley@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago

There really is Xkcd for everything.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

is there an xkcd for there always being an xkcd for everything? i wonder now ...

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] trk@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Codpiece@feddit.uk 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

No, real Americans would measure it in rocks, or football fields or something.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 day ago

"Stone" is British, we don't use that bullshit here.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

It's right there in the article.

over roughly the distance between New York and Florida

[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 165 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Pretty clickbait title to compare a lab speed to average internet. I'm sure it's several million times faster than average Japanese internet too.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 70 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (12 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Internet_connection_speeds

07.  United States 	274.16 Mbit/s

19.  Japan 	        212.06 Mbit/s

According to this page, seemingly sourced from Ookla, US has way higher average speeds these days.

Japan had way faster internet on average than the US like twenty years ago, but the US actually did a decent amount of broadband growth even if it still doesn't cover rural areas well.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

ranked by Speedtest.net data for January 2025

And the average speed of a passenger car is 170km/h, as ranked by speed data from the Nürburgring.

People on shitty slow connections don't have a need to go test that speed much, they know it's shit, people who just got their fancy new 1Gbit fiber and want to know exactly how fast it is, do.

[–] Subdivide6857@midwest.social 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is yet another thing the Republicans have been attacking (funding for rural broadband providers). Our rural areas are actually extremely well covered. Most of the midwest is fibered up. My local co-op’s minimum offered speed is 350x350.

[–] tamiya_tt02@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I'm in a rural place and I just have DSL for my house and LTE for my phone. Lived here 20 years and that's the worst thing about it.

[–] Subdivide6857@midwest.social 2 points 17 hours ago

My condolences. We have one last office to convert at the coop I work for. We’ll be 100% fiber by the end of the year. Hope your ISP is close as well.

[–] redlemace@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

ranked by Speedtest.net data

I have no other ideas to collect that data better but i'm sure that does not give a good generic view of the reality. Every tech I know in Sweden uses bredbandskollen. Even if an end-users is asked if they did test speed and delay, the site was bredbandskollen in nearly 100% of the cases if they had done so. Therefore I dare say speedtest is missing data and that list has no statistical relevance outside the scope of the speedtest user population.

Also, measuring speedtest result tells us about the subscription users took out. It does not tell anything about availability. I can get Gbit here, but subscribed to 100/100 because my average is low

[–] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 3 points 19 hours ago

Not to mention that Japan tends to use their own local services usually so I'm not sure if speedtest.net is even well known there.

load more comments (9 replies)

Its just got nothing to do with "internet". That is the issue with the headline. Its just some random piece of fiber that isnt even connected to any wider network. Im assuming they just used big ass rolled up rolls of fiber connected to one another to get to the 1800km. There are no end user "internet" applications for it either. The only thing it could be used for is isolated connections between internet hubs or inside datacenters for local network.

Still impressive ofcourse but just doesnt have anything to do with "internet" in the end user sense.

[–] HollowNaught@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (12 children)

Meanwhile in aus we get like 5 MB/s

;-;

[–] CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

A slow Internet is good for you.. You dontt have to worry about losing hair, eyes going blind and going crazy (too fast)

[–] DJDarren@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was complaining to my wife yesterday that it's not easy to find torrents for the Aus version of Taskmaster.

She told me to be patient, their internet is shit so it'll take a while to get it off their servers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] redlemace@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Half-duplex

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de 29 points 1 day ago

transmitting over 125,000 gigabytes of data per second over 1,120 miles (1,802 kilometers).

Please include usable metrics in the title

[–] malloc@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Ignoring clickbait title, this is impressive. Networked devices used to be the limit on data transfer.

Are there any devices even capable at reading/writing at 125,000G/sec?

Seems breakthroughs here are more relevant to for backhaul networks.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 14 points 1 day ago

Lol, does this mean there is one apartment building in Japan with a hundred units that uses more bandwidth than the entire United States 😂

[–] youngalfred@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The actual source: www.nict.go.jp

Not really an 'internet' world speed record, but really a wired data transmission record if I'm reading correctly.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›